If the heavies in the 70s were as weak as the heavies in other decades Liston would be considered the greatest heavy ever. What he did to Patterson was just unearthly.
Sonny Liston - great or ****e?
Collapse
-
i think that's because of ali's massive back. i think muhammad's back carries alot of weight, that is why ali weighs more than he looks.Originally posted by leffthinking about it i realize i allways thought clay looked small for his weight, mean he weight bout the same as foreman and didnt look nearly as beef.Comment
-
the hw's in the 80s pale in comparison to the hw's in the 60s.Originally posted by catskills23alis victories over liston mean as much as tyson's over larry holmes both were well past their best and both didnt train for the fight , liston beat nobody of note afterwards holmes beat contenders mercer and mcall and gave the great prime holyfield a tough fight . If anything tysons victory over holmes means more as holmes proved he had a lot more left .Comment
-
nah, i dont know, i think his back looks smaller than both listonb and foreman.Originally posted by butterfly1964i think that's because of ali's massive back. i think muhammad's back carries alot of weight, that is why ali weighs more than he looks.Comment
-
slow and clumsy. liston was highly over rated and he would take a dive for about thirty five cents if you asked him to.Originally posted by catskills23What i dont understand about liston isa some people say he was slow and clumsy and others say he was quick and powerful . Which was it ? .Comment
-
Originally posted by butterfly1964liston's handspeed was pretty damn good fool. if he was a slow puncher, then how come he ko'd patterson twice in one round?
thats because Patterson fought with him toe to toe, lol....Patterson don't have no chin, and weighed a hell of alot less than Liston.Comment
-
but my point is patterson is one of the fastest hw's of all time. doesn't matter if he has a weak chin or not, if liston put him away in one round, liston had to have had good hanspeed.Originally posted by The_One77thats because Patterson fought with him toe to toe, lol....Patterson don't have no chin, and weighed a hell of alot less than Liston.Comment
-
liston didn't care that much about boxing by the time clay fought him. in his prime he was a monster.Originally posted by blockheadslow and clumsy. liston was highly over rated and he would take a dive for about thirty five cents if you asked him to.Comment
-
Liston backed up Big George in sparring. Foreman has a much higher opinion of him and rightfully so. It was pretty hard to back up a prime George Foreman. Liston was in deep with the mob. Had he not been, he would have been champion for a long time. Clay gave him trouble, sure, but anyone who believes in the phantom punch is nuts. That was a dive, flat out. Just watch the film. The punch barely lands. Clay had him beat in the mental game for sure but it would take a truck to truly knock Liston out. If anything, Liston is vastly underrated.Comment
Comment