Does Lomanchenko losing make Rigo look better ?

[brickcityboxing]

I think if Lomachenko gets a title, every one would line up to fight him. He looks robotic, weak, and like if he can be outpointed with activity. It also looks like he's a herb, he lets himself get fouled without saying or doing anything. A great fighter find a way to either get the refs attention or adjust to avoid fouls, or foul back when all else fails. 395-1, for what, all of those fights, all of those wins, for nothing. He just looks like a poor man's Mikkel Kessler.

Lomachenko looks like the normally "good" 50-fight amateur, not the great, legendary, better than Rigondeaux, better than Mayweather, on par with SRR 395-1 amateur that people were talking about.

And why is his nickname Hi-Tech? It doesn't match his first name or surname but I guess it matches his style, he's a hi-technology robot.

kinda herbed out then ? lol

[Foreign Soil]

I don't need to tell myself anything. I asked a simple question and you chose to troll with your response to it. So I chose to stoop to your level but at least there is some truth to it. Rigo stops Santa Cruz and beats the brakes of Loma too...

You are trolling with the thread title. Pathetic nuthugger.

[FightingWords]

Yes, yes it does..

[Box-Office]

Rigo beats Loma and Santa Cruz in a 20 round tag team match ...

2 on 1 Handicap Match is what it would be called.

[brickcityboxing]

You are trolling with the thread title. Pathetic nuthugger.

How so ? The comparisons were made long before i created the post.

[DannYankee]

Of course not they are two different people and if Rigondeaux was the one taking a loss it wouldn't make Lomachenko look any better either. The dude has 2 pro fights, and his team fked up because they believed their own hype simple as that the pro's are not the ams, and you cannot take for granted that your greatness as an amateur will translate perfectly to a professional style immediately.

I bet Rigondeaux would have jumped if given the same chance Lomachenko got gifted to him in his second pro fight, but it would have been just as ****** even if he won.


On a side note it is sad if you are a fan of Rigo, and Lomachenko not being as good as a pro is a loss for Rigondeaux in terms of future opponents and great W for his resume, and more than anything olympic bragging rights that would have come from being the one to stop the Loma express. But Salido does not give a fk he keeps up fking up dream matches lol

[brickcityboxing]

Of course not they are two different people and if Rigondeaux was the one taking a loss it wouldn't make Lomachenko look any better either. The dude has 2 pro fights, and his team fked up because they believed their own hype simple as that the pro's are not the ams, and you cannot take for granted that your greatness as an amateur will translate perfectly to a professional style immediately.

I bet Rigondeaux would have jumped if given the same chance Lomachenko got gifted to him in his second pro fight, but it would have been just as ****** even if he won.


On a side note it is sad if you are a fan of Rigo, and Lomachenko not being as good as a pro is a loss for Rigondeaux in terms of future opponents and great W for his resume, and more than anything olympic bragging rights that would have come from being the one to stop the Loma express. But Salido does not give a fk he keeps up fking up dream matches lol

I believe in what rigo can do and even if things were even a tiny bit different and Loma got the win and somehow was able to secure a bout with Rigo in say his 4th fight he would eventually start to get beaten by lesser guys. That is after of course rigo beat him (badly). I don't think it would do anything for Rigo's resume either way ... I realize they are two different guys but the comparisons were there EVEN HBO MADE MENTION OF IT... I would think fan of rigo or not it makes you realize even though they both gold medaled twice, there's a class within "the class" and rigo pretty much stands alone..

[mezoomozaa]

Rigo would beat Donaire in his first pro fight ! and I am not exaggerating her !
Rigo K.O the likes of Salido easily, Salido wouldn't land a total of 10 punches in the whole fight !

But to be fair, Rigo vs Lomachenko would be an exciting fight, Lomachenko would put a better display than Salido fight, because Rigo style is very clean, no holding, no low blows, no dirty tactics at all, it will be Tom and Jerry match

[junior gong]

Wether you want to believe it or not the comparisons were there to begin with. The two gold medals, the gaudy amateur records, the obvious talent/blinding speed. I know the revisionists will say its apples and oranges, they will also note that Loma's in a different space having only had 1 pro bout prior, which is debatable. But Loma was being touted by some as the next Rigo. Regardless of how the fight played out (ref,low blows,scoring etc...), do you feel seeing Loma having been "cut from the same cloth" as Rigo, struggling and losing, shows just how remarkable and how difficult it is to accomplish what Rigo did in under 10 fights (not counting Donaire). In other words is Loma's loss Rigo's win ?

This OP is a cornucopia of ******ation.

[mezoomozaa]

I think its a loss for Rigo. If Loma had won he'd of made history and the bandwagon would be ridiculous and many would pick him over Rigo.
He'd of had a decent win and some momentum and it would of been two of the greatest amateurs to ever live going at it for all the marbles.

Rigondeaux would of absolutely destroyed Lomachenko and captured another world title in another division.

Rigo is probably a bit gutted he lost especially with the lack of opponents lining up.

I agree with you, but Rigo vs Loma is still one of the most anticipated fights for me, specially if Loma avenges his loss, which is a bit excusable ! many ATGS lost in their early fights, Lomachenko just needs to forget about his past, concentrates on the present moment and doesn't put expectations, nor his fans