Most pointless fight out there!!

[titan m]

Mayweather vs whoever he picks.

he been ducking the best since what 2007 , might as well retire. coward!

You seem genuinely upset, some of you guys really let Mayweather get in your heads.

[WilkinsOlajuwon]

Julio Diaz was coming of a draw with current 147 champ Shawn Porter he showed he could still hang

Was that fight at welterweight? Could it have been? Did Khan taste the canvas?

I dont get why Khan fans have to add ketchup to everything. Khan was one of the top fighters at 140 for a time. That time is over. If he is going to get back to the top he actually has to do something about it besides eat off his name and fights from years ago.

[SUBZER0ED]

Amir Khan has been offered a big $ fight vs Kell Brook and some jokers here are saying Khan is even ducking that.

Reasons why its a useless fight for Khan:

1) Out of Brook's 31 wins the biggest name is Senchenko?

2) Has never won or even been in a world title fight. Yet wants Khan? sad

3) Didnt enforce(ducked) mandatory title shots vs Alexander/Bradley.

4) A win wont mean a career boost as ppl will say "Brook was a hype job"

5) 31 fights each and a combined record of their opponents:

Khan - Wins 719, Losses 157

Brook - Wins 622, Losses 917

6) Not known in U.S. apart from oh yes his debut vs GOAT Luis Galarza.

Conclusion: Brook fight is big money, but Khan wants to become a stronger candidate to Floyd and beating Brook who hasnt even won a title means jack. Khan at that level doesnt need an eliminator for a shot. As for if Diaz/Molina are better? Diaz was atleast a world champ who drew with Porter a fight before and Molina was just a tuneup after a KO loss.

Why is Kell Brook not fighting a champion or even attempted to win a title? Are they not even confident in winning a belt? Khan atleast had star power to call for a Mayweather fight and if you pretend he doesnt well you were all pi$sed he may get it so thats proof.

A win vs Porter raises Khan's stock because of the belt and Porter being a name in U.S. Also A.B who is the new Andre Berto.

I like Khan vs Broner. It gives Khan a chance to maybe further validate himself, while providing a litmus test for Broner to see what level he's truly at. If Khan can get past Broner, then maybe a title shot against Porter is in order. I'm not sure Broner is quite the new Andre Berto yet. He only has the one embarrassment so far.

[Sparked_26]

I want to see this fight.

Brook's competition for a now seasoned pro is indefensible though.

But it is a very interesting fight. Both guys could win.

Brook is a powerful puncher at the very least - what more he has to offer at world class is another matter. But if you were Brook you'd be so confident of smashing Khan to floor given his recent struggles.

Khan on the other hand will believe he is so much better than Brook and will overwhelm with speed.

It's a great fight tbh.

Not really fussed if it captures an American audience. The money is already on the table.

[Guest]

I want to see this fight.

Brook's competition for a now seasoned pro is indefensible though.

But it is a very interesting fight. Both guys could win.

Brook is a powerful puncher at the very least - what more he has to offer at world class is another matter. But if you were Brook you'd be so confident of smashing Khan to floor given his recent struggles.

Khan on the other hand will believe he is so much better than Brook and will overwhelm with speed.

It's a great fight tbh.

Not really fussed if it captures an American audience. The money is already on the table.

It is and I don't feel the ts reasons for it being pointless are compelling at all.

[Uklad]

Khan's a Bigger name than Brook in the Uk, anytime,anywhere, anyday (Except for Brook's Hometown offcourse).

[Box-Office]

Uhm. It's prizefighting. They are fighting for money. Khan can make big money and get a paper belt out of it. Why the hell not? Seriously? I hope you're not a boxing manager.

I hope you kept your day job because comedy isnt working out.

Kell Brook win would be disregarded as hype job but if he beats Porter and defends the belt against Brook then its better because it'll be like "oh a domestic title showdown". Beating brook brings money but doesnt add to credibility.

[Box-Office]

Was that fight at welterweight? Could it have been? Did Khan taste the canvas?

I dont get why Khan fans have to add ketchup to everything. Khan was one of the top fighters at 140 for a time. That time is over. If he is going to get back to the top he actually has to do something about it besides eat off his name and fights from years ago.

Brook needs to do the same but guess what he cant even eat off of past wins i mean who is he gonna ride off of? Senchenko? Ndou? C.Jones?

[WilkinsOlajuwon]

Brook needs to do the same but guess what he cant even eat off of past wins i mean who is he gonna ride off of? Senchenko? Ndou? C.Jones?

Now you are talking about 2 different things. Highlighting Brook's shortcomings doesnt do anything to hide Khan's.

Khan just needs to shut his mouth and take a competitive fight at 147. His hands can shut everyone up.

[Box-Office]

How are they more credible? Alexander lost to Bradley, Porter and even Kotelnik.
Broner has 2 fights at 147, 1 loss and 1 win that many taught he lost.

Brook is the biggest fight for Khan and the hardest.

Brook is better than Alexander? Broner?

Atleast those two have won multiple world titles and are a known name. Neither of which Brooks has. If those two had Brook's opponents they wouldve been undefeated too.