Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who ranks higher in your ATG list? Joe Frazier or Wladimir Klitschko?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    WK by far when it comes to skills and achievments....

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by King- View Post
      Wlad runs through Ali, Frazier and Tyson's resumes without breaking a sweat
      I'll take this gem

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by jasjas View Post
        Wlad is a B plus fighter in a E minus era and frazier was an A plus fighter in an A plus era
        One could probably make the argument Fraziers era was slightly worse then Wlads due to size difference alone.


        As crazy as it sounds. Wlad would of been a man among boys

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by King- View Post
          Szef99 and probably some writers/"experts"



          Either way... Our opinions are our opinions but Wlads current title reign, dominance during his era, historical numbers and to a slightly lesser degree- résumé, speak for itself.
          Sorry but no. He's higher on that list than Frazier though

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Szef99 View Post
            Sorry but no. He's higher on that list than Frazier though
            Barring any injuries or losses, Wlad could be GOAT, IMO. I guess that's just me then

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by King- View Post
              One could probably make the argument Fraziers era was slightly worse then Wlads due to size difference alone.


              As crazy as it sounds. Wlad would of been a man among boys
              Muhammad Ali was a boy? George Foreman was a boy?





              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Szef99 View Post
                So it doesn't count

                My bad, I forgot that Leon Spinks didn't knock Ali out he outpointed him something that has never happaned to Wlad, pre or post Steward.

                Still doesn't look good

                I don't really rate Tyson that much but he was really hyped.
                It counts, but it's just a bit far-fetched to go from "most great heavyweights were stopped by average fighters at some point" to go back to 2 fighters that fought 100 years ago, but each to his own.

                So it's better to get knocked out by jouneymen than to lose a decision to an olympic gold medalist? Plus he won an immediate rematch - something Wlad could learn from. Add to that, he shouldn't even be fighting at that point and came in ridiculously bad shape.

                Tyson was great - he was a victim of his own success though.
                Last edited by LacedUp; 02-23-2014, 10:49 AM.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by King- View Post
                  One could probably make the argument Fraziers era was slightly worse then Wlads due to size difference alone.


                  As crazy as it sounds. Wlad would of been a man among boys
                  Oh god,

                  Please stop yourself.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by King- View Post
                    How can you compare Purrity and Sanders to any other ATGs opponent? I can just say Wlad runs through Ali, Frazier and Tyson's resumes without breaking a sweat
                    Originally posted by Armed Convict View Post
                    I'll take this gem




                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Klitschko has been dominant but he lacks a meaningful win. Frazier has a W over the Greatest. Long title reigns don't mean anything without real opponents.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP