Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: I Think There Should Be Five Judges in a Fight

[Derranged]

Bradley will dominate him again.

Pacquiao got exposed by 40 year old Marquez.
He's done.

Bradley is just going to state that fact - finally retire him.

[techliam]

Yeah that panel was effective. Love the way they took the belt away from Bradley and reversed the outcome.

The WBO can't do that...what do you expect?

[IMDAZED]

The WBO can't do that...what do you expect?

Nothing. Which is my point. It meant nothing.

[techliam]

Nothing. Which is my point. It meant nothing.

It's up to you what weight you put on the panels opinion

You could argue that the official decision meant nothing....other than a belt for Bradley. Up to you

However, it's the only solid 5-man panel of judges I can refer to

[Manic Shot]

Only one judge, the referee.

[skinnystev]

no judges you should have to win by KO or submission

[lets rumble]

bob arum couldnt afford to pay 5 judges off !!!!
lets be realistic guys

[hugh grant]

Bradley, even Ray Charles can see you lost by 10 rounds. So no amount of judges will matter if the fight is fixed like it was.

But you are right it is hard to judge other fights when the ropes are in the way or the backs of the boxers is impingeing the view of the refs.

[bambam182]

bradley is going to spank his ass again.

[junior gong]

Bradley will dominate him again.

Pacquiao got exposed by 40 year old Marquez.
He's done.

Bradley is just going to state that fact - finally retire him.

Asolutely fooking mental!


Try actually watching the fight and not just going with what some other ******ed floydspastic told you happened.