Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: I Think There Should Be Five Judges in a Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bigg Rigg
    The People's Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2013
    • 11387
    • 280
    • 58
    • 20,735

    #31
    Bradley be trolling like a mother ****er. Lol we don't need five judges either. 3 are good enough.

    Comment

    • techliam
      Caneloweight Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 5526
      • 371
      • 23
      • 42,424

      #32
      Five judges like the WBO panel after the Bradley fight that unaninmously saw a Pac victory?

      But yes, five judges seems fair. I fear more judges will go to highlight the big differences in judges scoring, maybe making a judges score less legitimate...but who knows

      Comment

      • IMDAZED
        Fair but Firm
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 42644
        • 1,134
        • 1,770
        • 67,152

        #33
        Originally posted by techliam
        Five judges like the WBO panel after the Bradley fight that unaninmously saw a Pac victory?

        But yes, five judges seems fair. I fear more judges will go to highlight the big differences in judges scoring, maybe making a judges score less legitimate...but who knows
        Yeah that panel was effective. Love the way they took the belt away from Bradley and reversed the outcome.

        Comment

        • MrRolltide91
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2010
          • 12208
          • 167
          • 1
          • 30,631

          #34
          Originally posted by New England
          i think that's a good idea. there should also be 13 rounds in a fight.
          Because it won't be a draw?

          Comment

          • hugh grant
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2006
            • 30545
            • 2,201
            • 927
            • 105,596

            #35
            Well it certainly won help Bradley. Its the fact that the judges couldn't see the fight properly which helped Bradley get the decision over Pac.

            If the judges scored what actually happened you would have lost 10 rounds to 2.
            So be quiet again Bradley, no one believes a word you say. You lied about thinking you beat Pac, so why should we believe you when you say you think you beat JMM and Provodnikov?

            Comment

            • A-Wolf
              This One Can See
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2011
              • 6759
              • 265
              • 337
              • 61,371

              #36
              Terrible idea. Arum would have to pay two additional people every time there's a fight.

              Comment

              • BuckToothed
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 2715
                • 300
                • 139
                • 22,872

                #37
                How bout we just eliminate judges and go back to unlimited rounds, whoever quits first, voluntarily or otherwise...

                Comment

                • KING MEAT
                  Dorian's Protege
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 14902
                  • 844
                  • 279
                  • 185,196

                  #38
                  bradleys trolling and pissin everyone off lol.




                  Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                  Comment

                  • uncommon
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 331
                    • 12
                    • 1
                    • 6,386

                    #39
                    Five judges that have eyes to see and that have rules to follow on how to judge a contest is not a bad idea.

                    Where decisions are disputed by either fighter a post-fight video review using strict criteria to evaluate a win is also worth trying.


                    Five crooked opinions are as worthless as three.

                    Comment

                    • HAY-B
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2013
                      • 1094
                      • 64
                      • 114
                      • 15,073

                      #40
                      I agree. there should be 5 judges. one on each side of the ring and the 5th judge should be viewing the same view the folks at home are viewing on the tv screen. I believe the 5ht judge should be the commissioner of the athletic association where the fight is being held. granted this will only work for televised fights. however when judges returned bogus score cards, it forces the commissioner to address any and all issues right then and there. this will definitely should the world who is and who is not corrupt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP