Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: I Think There Should Be Five Judges in a Fight

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

BoxingScene.com recently spoke to WBO welterweight champion Timothy "Desert Storm" Bradley about his upcoming fight against Manny Pacquiao. The fight will be a rematch of their June 2012 battle that ended with Bradley winning a controversial split decision. With the scrutiny that fight received, I asked Bradley if he felt he feels comfortable that he can win a decision in a rematch.

[Click Here To Read More]

[Heavy Heart]

Bradley Bradley Bradley...You won a gift BELT. Now you want 5 judges...lol!
You can add Marquez while he's watching from the audience.

[Tamis!]

Someone please tell Bradley to STFU.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You'd have to spend a lot more money paying them off then

[zuz]

Bradley Bradley Bradley...You won a gift BELT.

Like Pacquiao 3 times against Marquez?

[bojangles1987]

I think so, too. Harder for 5 judges to screw Pac in the first fight than it was for 3.

[LADIV]

If the judges were paid off and gave bradley a gift decision
i wonder who paid the judges off

[New England]

i think that's a good idea. there should also be 13 rounds in a fight.

[zuz]

Bradley will dominate him again.

Pacquiao got exposed by 40 year old Marquez.
He's done.

Bradley is just going to state that fact - finally retire him.

[jas]

so basically bradley is saying the more judges there are, the better yet in his first fight it was the opposite as public opinion and the press row scored it for pacquaio whilst 3 people outside the ring scored it for bradley.

so which one is it?

more judges the better or not???