Why does Pacquiao's resume have so many of the same name?

[A-Wolf]

Why does Bob Arum's bank account have nine zeros in it?

[J The UnBiased]

1. Pac, Thurman, possibly Bradley would beat Canelo.

2. Here is Hectari's exact quote.

"Name one opponent in Floyds recent fights who is better than Timothy Bradley. Most of Floyds opponents if not all have been flat foot guys and tailormade.

Name one guy who is as elusive or crafty as Bradley."

Last I checked, he's right. Not only is Bradley a better name on your resume, but he is indeed elusive and crafty.

Canelo is tailor made for Floyd's style. That's why I brought up the Norton and Foreman analogy.

__________________

You're entitled to your opinion, but me and you both know watsup. Anyway, yes Bradley is crafty and elusive. But are we pointing that out to say that he'd do a better job against Floyd? Because he wouldn't. 10 rounds to 2, just like Canelo.

[BUNGALOWS]

You're entitled to your opinion, but me and you both know watsup. Anyway, yes Bradley is crafty and elusive. But are we pointing that out to say that he'd do a better job against Floyd? Because he wouldn't. 10 rounds to 2, just like Canelo.

Haha, ya see, that's what we were really arguing this whole time, and now you finally admit it.

Sorry girl, Bradley would be a way better test than Canelo.

[ADP02]

yeah because a poll on NSB is credible, fool .

See even Floyd fans are too embarrassed by this poll thingy that they can't even admit to Floyd requesting that his fans pick a cherry! Poor Floyd fans are now in denial mode!

[J The UnBiased]

Haha, ya see, that's what we were really arguing this whole time, and now you finally admit it.

Sorry girl, Bradley would be a way better test than Canelo.

I mean I got the hint that thats where you were trying to steer the conversation and I can pick up on when a female is trying to push the conversation into something it's not. The man asked who was better than Bradley, I said Canelo would beat him. Of course you got your pom poms out parading about Floyd Mayweather and Ken Norton. Now you wanna talk about how Bradley is a bigger test than Canelo, man this aint that bruh. You weak lmao

[BUNGALOWS]

I mean I got the hint that thats where you were trying to steer the conversation and I can pick up on when a female is trying to push the conversation into something it's not. The man asked who was better than Bradley, I said Canelo would beat him. Of course you got your pom poms out parading about Floyd Mayweather and Ken Norton. Now you wanna talk about how Bradley is a bigger test than Canelo, man this aint that bruh. You weak lmao

Little girl crying now?

[J The UnBiased]

Little girl crying now?

crocodile tears bruh, get my dick out ya mouth

[PACnPBFsuck]

#yolo.........

[soul_survivor]

Wouldn't have to keep fighting them if he could beat them cleanly the first time

You don't think Manny beat Barrera and Bradley clean the first time?

[junior gong]

Because he's fraud created by the media to be a great fighter but you can't be great fighting the same style over and over again.

Maybe PAC is really ******ed and can't handle different styles.

He lost to morales, Marquez, and Bradley decent fighters but I wouldn't confuse any of those fighters as having a difficult style to figure out.

If you keep fighting the same fighters it's easy to look good.

At least Manny fought great fighters. Floyd never did that.