Does boxing have more hater 'fans' than any other sport?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Foreign Soil
    First Time Skeptic
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 5249
    • 194
    • 219
    • 11,783

    #31
    Originally posted by Slip Stream
    The "scandals" are not real friend, they have zero evidence connecting the president to anything or any intional wrongdoing on his part. The only connection there is seems to be in the minds of the GOP who are determined to deny President ***** any significant victory even at the risk of sinking the country.

    The GOP are ineffective at getting answers because there's nothing else to provide. If there was some small bit of evidence they could hang their hats on they would. So in the absence of that they make **** up and lie on a daily basis. Its ultimately a losing strategy as the re-election of Barack ***** proved, but more than that the GOP consists of graying white dinosaurs that are going extinct even as you and I are dialogue. Look at their presidential conventions, mostly white and old. Think about the GOP these days, its about white resentment and grievance.

    They hate what ***** represents but what the president represents isn't ever going to change and they know that. So in the end, blind hatred is all some people will ever have.



    How can it be said of ********s, give specific examples please.
    Even hardcore ********s are jumping off the ***** bandwagon - the NSA spying being just one of the reasons - it's not just the GOP. **********s aren't really interested in getting answers as ********s aren't interested in giving them, as many of the same things that are going down in office would be happening if a ********** was President - they just want the scandals known, that's all they need for reelection. In the end, all that matters is if the people care enough about the scandals or not. "peeleft:

    Comment

    • bklynboy
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 1256
      • 78
      • 149
      • 8,406

      #32
      Originally posted by Slip Stream
      The "scandals" are not real friend, they have zero evidence connecting the president to anything or any intional wrongdoing on his part. The only connection there is seems to be in the minds of the GOP who are determined to deny President ***** any significant victory even at the risk of sinking the country.

      The GOP are ineffective at getting answers because there's nothing else to provide. If there was some small bit of evidence they could hang their hats on they would. So in the absence of that they make **** up and lie on a daily basis. Its ultimately a losing strategy as the re-election of Barack ***** proved, but more than that the GOP consists of graying white dinosaurs that are going extinct even as you and I are dialogue. Look at their presidential conventions, mostly white and old. Think about the GOP these days, its about white resentment and grievance.

      They hate what ***** represents but what the president represents isn't ever going to change and they know that. So in the end, blind hatred is all some people will ever have.



      How can it be said of ********s, give specific examples please.
      Not interested in talking politics here but examples from dems include

      the War on Women (a fancy way for talking about ********). And yet Dems are for seat belt and helmet laws. Hmmm you have the right over your own body to have an ******** but not to decide whether or not to wear a helmet?

      The 2nd ********* hoop-la is another.

      Medi-scare is a third.

      I could go on. And I'm sure you would like to debate some of the issues I brought up but let's not. Not here. I'm glad that this is a politics-free-zone.

      Comment

      • Slip Stream
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 3104
        • 259
        • 357
        • 16,595

        #33
        Originally posted by Foreign Soil
        Even hardcore ********s are jumping off the ***** bandwagon - the NSA spying being just one of the reasons - it's not just the GOP. **********s aren't really interested in getting answers as ********s aren't interested in giving them, as many of the same things that are going down in office would be happening if a ********** was President - they just want the scandals known, that's all they need for reelection. In the end, all that matters is if the people care enough about the scandals or not. "peeleft:
        Bull**** dude, and the NSA was doing the same thing with Bush and previous presidents in office. I understand the GOP wants to turn ***** into a Communistic, Socialist, ******, Santa Claus dictator but you actually need facts to do that, evidence. There are no scandals except in New Jersey.

        Originally posted by bklynboy
        Not interested in talking politics here but examples from dems include

        the War on Women (a fancy way for talking about ********). And yet Dems are for seat belt and helmet laws. Hmmm you have the right over your own body to have an ******** but not to decide whether or not to wear a helmet?

        The 2nd ********* hoop-la is another.

        Medi-scare is a third.

        I could go on. And I'm sure you would like to debate some of the issues I brought up but let's not. Not here. I'm glad that this is a politics-free-zone.
        Huh? You lost me.....

        Comment

        • Foreign Soil
          First Time Skeptic
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2013
          • 5249
          • 194
          • 219
          • 11,783

          #34
          Originally posted by Slip Stream
          Bull**** dude, and the NSA was doing the same thing with Bush and previous presidents in office. I understand the GOP wants to turn ***** into a Communistic, Socialist, ******, Santa Claus dictator but you actually need facts to do that, evidence. There are no scandals except in New Jersey.



          Huh? You lost me.....
          I see there's no point discussing things with you. Ignorance is bliss.

          Comment

          • AVDB
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2012
            • 1013
            • 70
            • 84
            • 7,170

            #35
            Yes. No matter how much of a warrior you are inside the ring, how many weight classes you move up and how much of a humble gentleman you are, there will be haters. Manny showed me this

            Comment

            • SouthPawHitman
              Tom Brady=GOAT
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2013
              • 7979
              • 700
              • 2,346
              • 41,233

              #36
              Boxing has some ignorant,dumbass fans. I get annoyed by the hate and constant criticism of fighters. When people on here call decent fighters bums,that gets on my nerves.

              Comment

              • PainfromUkraine
                The Takeover
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2013
                • 2725
                • 348
                • 283
                • 10,024

                #37
                Originally posted by SouthPawHitman
                Boxing has some ignorant,dumbass fans. I get annoyed by the hate and constant criticism of fighters. When people on here call decent fighters bums,that gets on my nerves.
                True.

                Comment

                • -Kev-
                  this is boxing
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 39960
                  • 5,045
                  • 1,449
                  • 234,543

                  #38
                  Of course not, Boxing is a dinky little sport compared to other sports.

                  There's Soccer, Baseball, Basketball which is watch by millions and millions of people, and in turn have millions of haters.

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Golovkin
                    When you look at it, the biggest hater groups tend to be of the most successful fighters in the sport. That is another way of showing that they are indeed the greatest in the sport.

                    Golovkin, Pacquiao, Mayweather... < Top 3.
                    You think Golovkin is top 3 most hated boxer?

                    Most people I know like him, they just want to see him step up. Other than that, he's nowhere near known enough to be able to say he's hated as much as a pacman or a mayweather.

                    Comment

                    • Slip Stream
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 3104
                      • 259
                      • 357
                      • 16,595

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Foreign Soil
                      I see there's no point discussing things with you. Ignorance is bliss.
                      Yes, no point in discussing anything is there, especially when one has zero facts.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP