So am I biased or am I underestimating? 
Most of the world thought that the fight was at the very least threatening to some degree.
Again I really don't understand what you're trying to say here it's like you're just thinking of something and saying it for the sake of it.
I was impressed with the Canelo win, not so much with the Cotto win.
I was impressed by Golovkin's win over Macklin, not so much with Stevens or Adama.
What's the point and where's the connection you're trying to make?

Most of the world thought that the fight was at the very least threatening to some degree.
Again I really don't understand what you're trying to say here it's like you're just thinking of something and saying it for the sake of it.
I was impressed with the Canelo win, not so much with the Cotto win.
I was impressed by Golovkin's win over Macklin, not so much with Stevens or Adama.
What's the point and where's the connection you're trying to make?
Comment