Comments Thread For: Groves Loses Appeal, IBF Stands By 85-15 Split For Froch

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SkillspayBills
    Garlic Butter Gang!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 29181
    • 2,155
    • 3,739
    • 61,188

    #31
    Man can it backfire on you any worse? Whoever handles his contracts should be fired immediately. If you actually THOUGHT a few moves ahead you would realize this could be a very possible outcome for Groves.

    Comment

    • MrRolltide91
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2010
      • 12208
      • 167
      • 1
      • 30,631

      #32
      lmao this is funny

      Comment

      • Russian Crushin
        atheist with a gun
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 33788
        • 1,471
        • 836
        • 46,625

        #33
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        An 85/15 split is the standard split in a champion vs mandatory situation. Groves was trying to change the rules to get more money.
        No I think it's the usual 75-25 but 85-15 when the non champ is not the top rated challenger

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #34
          Originally posted by Russian Crushin
          No I think it's the usual 75-25 but 85-15 when the non champ is not the top rated challenger
          Yeah that could be true. Either way, its the IBF rules. People on here are talking like Groves has been victimised - it's the rules dummies.

          Comment

          • Ric1889
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Jul 2011
            • 50
            • 3
            • 0
            • 6,215

            #35
            So by the way people are talking Groves will get less than the £1m he was offered already.....but why is 15% of the purse necessarily going to be less than £1m? Anyone know what the purse was for the first fight?

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #36
              Originally posted by Ric1889
              So by the way people are talking Groves will get less than the £1m he was offered already.....but why is 15% of the purse necessarily going to be less than £1m? Anyone know what the purse was for the first fight?
              Matchroom offered him 25%.

              Comment

              • Ric1889
                Up and Comer
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Jul 2011
                • 50
                • 3
                • 0
                • 6,215

                #37
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                Matchroom offered him 25%.
                Cheers - I thought the £1m was just a flat offer. Saw Frotch's brother ****ing on about the 25% on twitter but presumed he was just on the wind up.

                Comment

                • uncommon
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Jan 2014
                  • 331
                  • 12
                  • 1
                  • 6,386

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  An 85/15 split is the standard split in a champion vs mandatory situation. Groves was trying to change the rules to get more money.
                  Standard what? Standard scam/rip off? After paying all taxes, fees, and expenses he'll end up with what 4%. No thanks says a smart man. Who is the IBF to make this rule anyway? Who needs a belt anyway? Let these two fight an unsanctioned fight and split the purse. That's the way to do it.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #39
                    Originally posted by uncommon
                    Standard what? Standard scam/rip off? After paying all taxes, fees, and expenses he'll end up with what 4%. No thanks says a smart man. Who is the IBF to make this rule anyway? Who needs a belt anyway? Let these two fight an unsanctioned fight and split the purse. That's the way to do it.
                    It's in the IBF Rules. Should they change their rules AGAIN just for George Groves? Why are you acting like Groves is being victimised?

                    Comment

                    • jas
                      Voice of Reason
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 22500
                      • 933
                      • 908
                      • 1,059,614

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      Groves getting owned on Twatter....










                      Ouchhhhhh! Lol.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP