Tweet
Should there be a Super heavyweight Division?
I wholeheartedly agree. Wlad picking on Byrd so he can say he has a belt. I say heavy should be 200 to 235 pounds,
Superheavy 235 and up.
Superheavy 235 and up.
-
52Yes, too many bigger heavyweights trying to fight smaller heavyweights (Klitschkos)...28.85%15No, keep it how it is...69.23%36Not sure...1.92%1 -
no thats ******, it just creates a much bigger mess then it allready is, stop bitching....Originally posted by .:BLOODSHED:. -
if theres one thing boxing doesnt need, its another division.Comment
-
no that just creates another divison for more unworthy championsComment
-
Again with the Klitschko hate. How many hate threads have you made recently? Its getting ridiculous. And no, I dont think so because the superheavy divison would be in worse shape than the HW's are now.Comment
-
So that means Toney will float in and out of the Super heavyweight division.Originally posted by .:BLOODSHED:.
Not good.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!Comment
-
i'd do it make crusier up to 220 it would make that class a lot better . then just have the heavys anything overComment
-
Nothing needs to be changed except for possibly combining some of the lighter weights. I don't see the sense of having 126 and then 130. A super-heavyweight division would just saturate the market even more.Comment
-
yeah thats what i'm saying whats the need of a 5 lbs dif in weight classes just combined a few ...this was the point of the p4p thread i made the heavyweight class is like a p4p class now it's just not fair for 200 lbs guys to fight the 250-300 + guys we have nowOriginally posted by enadeusComment
-
It would be better if there's going to be a super Heavyweight Division.
A lot of fights are not really competitive. Smaller heavy weights are figting opponents who were 25 to 30 pounds heavier not to mention the height disparity.Comment
Comment