Holyfield deserves a reward

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Humean
    Infidel
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 3054
    • 126
    • 110
    • 10,285

    #231
    Originally posted by daggum
    lol good one
    I'm not a Christian myself nor much of a fan of Christianity but there are and have been numerous Christian Nobel Laureates.

    Comment

    • billeau2
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2012
      • 27644
      • 6,396
      • 14,933
      • 339,839

      #232
      Originally posted by low_Bo
      Instead of criticizing Holyfield for his comments on ******ry, people should be preparing a reward for him. At least he has the balls to state what he believes in rather than submit to the modern-day ****sexual propaganda agenda. Holyfield is the man!

      Yeah the political correct fascism is a real b1tch. We should call it what it really is: censorship

      Comment

      • daggum
        All time great
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2008
        • 43444
        • 4,545
        • 3
        • 166,270

        #233
        Originally posted by Humean
        I'm not a Christian myself nor much of a fan of Christianity but there are and have been numerous Christian Nobel Laureates.
        yeah but they also gave the nobel peace prize to a guy who authorizes bombing innocent people so i don't trust their judgement. they lost all their credibility just like the boxing hall of fame when it elected joe calzaghe.

        Comment

        • Hanton11
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 70
          • 1
          • 0
          • 6,133

          #234
          Originally posted by billeau2
          Yeah the political correct fascism is a real b1tch. We should call it what it really is: censorship
          Umm, has he actually been silenced though? His views were put out on tv and not removed (it wasn't live) for millions to listen to. He didn't receive any punishment other than a warning that his words could cause offense.

          Criticism =/= Censoring

          Comment

          • Humean
            Infidel
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 3054
            • 126
            • 110
            • 10,285

            #235
            Originally posted by daggum
            yeah but they also gave the nobel peace prize to a guy who authorizes bombing innocent people so i don't trust their judgement. they lost all their credibility just like the boxing hall of fame when it elected joe calzaghe.
            The Peace prize is far less respectable than their other prizes, mainly because the Peace prize is very politically driven unlike the other prizes. To win the Noble prize in Physics, Chemistry, Medicine and Economics means you are in the forefront of science.

            Oh and don't bait me about Calzaghe!

            Comment

            • LacedUp
              Still Smokin'
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 29171
              • 781
              • 381
              • 132,163

              #236
              Originally posted by BMWM3P
              So according to you a right doesn't exist, lol.

              All of that blabber to prove my point. A right will always have to be recognized by a government or a constitution. A privilege is something that you have to qualify for, it has to be be granted and it can be denied, it can also be taken away for any reason.
              Right, so freedom of speech is not a birth right in China. Would you say it would be a privilege if someone was granted the freedom of speech in China? Yes you would, because it wasn't granted before. Now, the american constitution has granted their inhabitants the freedom of speech - that does not mean it is a birth right for a human being - the only true rights.

              See, I don't have to regurgitate what I've read on Google 5 minutes ago to form an opinion on this. You simply cannot hang with me in this discussion by pulling up Google privilege definitions. As I said before, freedom of speech is a privilege given to inhabitants by various governments around the world. It is also recognized as a human right, but is one of the most disputed ones, even with exceptions recognized by FN.

              It is also disputed by law in many cases. As per instance, and this could be the wrong person mind you, I believe the guitarist from queen once sued a newspaper for assuming he was gay and won. The newspaper filed for freedom of speech, the man filed for libel. He won. Why? Because freedom of speech is not an unconditional right. See where this is going?

              Small minded people will resort to claiming they have a right to say whatever babel that comes to their mind, citing freedom of speech, when the right was given to people to protect their liberty - not discriminate against ********** (which is also illegal in many countries in the world including Britain and many european nations).

              Originally posted by BMWM3P
              No I am not a practicing christian but I grew up in a christian family and the very definition of being a christian is living by what the bible says. You don't say you are a christian and say yhat the bible is outdated, flawed or mistranlated you are supposed to have faith that this is all the word of God. So you can't be a christian and ignore what is not convinient to you in the bible.

              Also, Evander or anyone who doesn't share your views is not advocating discrimination or hate. They just don't approve of ****sexual behavior and are not willing to support it in anyway, shape or form.
              You are not a practicing Christian, but you think you have the position to tell me I'm not a Christian based on the fact that I don't believe it's right to discriminate, even though some perceptions of the bible will have you know that God didn't mean for man and man to be together.

              It has nothing to do with what's convenient in the bible. The bible isn't meant for Christians to follow word for word. It's a book written by man, not by God! Extremists will follow the word of the bible to pin points, and wish to tell everyone else they aren't Christians because they don't live by the same standards as they do.

              Guess what my friend, it is not up to you.

              Originally posted by BMWM3P
              Also, Evander or anyone who doesn't share your views is not advocating discrimination or hate. They just don't approve of ****sexual behavior and are not willing to support it in anyway, shape or form.
              Dude are you serious with this ****? I couldn't give a crap about what evander holyfield thinks about gay people. It's the fact that he says it in public, putting ****sexuals at risk for further discrimination. How can you not get that?

              Comment

              • Weltschmerz
                Sehnsucht
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 16546
                • 698
                • 1,622
                • 27,699

                #237
                Originally posted by LacedUp
                zzzZzzzZzz
                Really? That's all you got?

                Comment

                • trixx12
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 511
                  • 28
                  • 40
                  • 6,750

                  #238
                  Holyfield deserves award.****sexualtiy is disgusting yuck.

                  Comment

                  • Weltschmerz
                    Sehnsucht
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 16546
                    • 698
                    • 1,622
                    • 27,699

                    #239
                    Originally posted by trixx12
                    Holyfield deserves award.****sexualtiy is disgusting yuck.
                    You don't have to engage in it

                    Comment

                    • BMWM3P
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 5402
                      • 245
                      • 345
                      • 12,386

                      #240
                      Originally posted by LacedUp
                      Right, so freedom of speech is not a birth right in China. Would you say it would be a privilege if someone was granted the freedom of speech in China? Yes you would, because it wasn't granted before. Now, the american constitution has granted their inhabitants the freedom of speech - that does not mean it is a birth right for a human being - the only true rights.

                      See, I don't have to regurgitate what I've read on Google 5 minutes ago to form an opinion on this. You simply cannot hang with me in this discussion by pulling up Google privilege definitions. As I said before, freedom of speech is a privilege given to inhabitants by various governments around the world. It is also recognized as a human right, but is one of the most disputed ones, even with exceptions recognized by FN.







                      Dude are you serious with this ****? I couldn't give a crap about what evander holyfield thinks about gay people. It's the fact that he says it in public, putting ****sexuals at risk for further discrimination. How can you not get that?



                      LOL, you are reaching last time I checked it wasn't Evander Ling it's Holyfield, an american citizen, expressing his right to free speech. And true rights, please, what a tard.


                      Hang with you!!!! Ha,ha this must be a joke. Weren't you the same idiot that told me to look up the definition of privilege?

                      I gave you what you asked for, not that I needed for myself but you made it cristal clear that you obviously didn't know what the word means. I have clearly destroyed your argument that I didn't know what a right is and you did. You have not answered one of my points and are just trying to walk back your ridiculous statement. Which in the proccess you have led you to contradict yourself and desperately resort to semantics to try to prove your point.


                      What else can you expect from a christian that doesn't believe in the bible or is it an atheist that believes in God.
                      Last edited by BMWM3P; 01-08-2014, 10:01 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP