Tim Bradley v Amir Khan - who wins and how?

[LacedUp]

To bad all Timmy does win..

Yeah, especially against Pacquiao.

Boxing is subjective!!

[Dirk Diggler UK]

To bad all Timmy does win..

Easy when you cherry pick and have the judges/refs in your pocket

[LacedUp]

Tim fought and beat Carlos Abregu at WW who was undefeated at the time (and has since not lost to anyone else).

Abregu... Which I would tab him to beat khan also.....

Oh sorry, fighting Abregu who had never fought at world level at ww two years before he fought Pac was a clear indication of his credibility.

[The Ninth Layer]

Who has Bradley cherry-picked? LOL

[LacedUp]

Easy when you cherry pick and have the judges/refs in your pocket

Boxing is subjective Dirk.

If Rome thinks Bradley won 8-4 against Pacquaio then he did.

[LacedUp]

Who has Bradley cherry-picked? LOL

Casamayor?

[The Ninth Layer]

Name one champion in any weight class who has fought and beaten three undefeated fighters in a row without controversy. Besides Tim Bradley, that is.

[The Ninth Layer]

Casamayor?

Wow you must either be desperate or willfully ******ed. His first fight with Top Rank he fought Casamayor to get exposure on a PPV card for Pacquiao. Try using your brain sometime, it's a useful organ when you let it be.

[-MEGA-]

Oh, so you run out of things to back up your claim that Bradley is not featherfisted, so you go into a strange triangle theory about Holt > Diaz -> drop Khan = Bradley has power? hahaha. It was literally one of the worst arguments I've ever seen.



No it's not. He hasn't had a legit ko since 2007, despite fighting some fighters who could and should be stopped at world level.

But hey, "he almost dropped" a few right?

It's already been proven, your just to lovestruck to see it....I can't help with that.

[Rome-By-Ko]

When did he fight at WW?

Wtf are you talking about? I mentioned Pac, Holt, Garnica? Haha. 2 of which were before Pac, one was pac. Are you having trouble reading son?

Bradley didn't beat Pacquiao and was beaten from post to post by Provo. So no, he's not undefeated. Everyone except his nuthugging fans know that Bradley was completely outclassed against Pacquiao. There were boos around the arena after the decision, everyone had it 10-2 or 11-1. Except for rome-by-ko's legendary scorecard that had Bradley winning

How was it you put it? "Boxing is subjective".

You are being a hypocrite, as per usual. You say Khan hasn't done anything at WW, and Bradley earned his shot, despite not having a single damn fight at WW? GTFO. That's double standards dude.

So Khan has lost twice in his career, he should have never lost to Peterson. And what about Bradley? Didn't he get schooled vs Pacquiao? Wasn't he on ***** street vs Provo? Didn't some people also think he lost to JMM?

Bradley is not some undefeated beast.

This is your whole post word for word..Where did you mention Holt or Garnica??You only mention Pac in order to tear into Tim..

Oh and btw Abregu was a WW fight..So,once again wrong there..Oh and btw that was before the Pac fight..Damn feeling ****** yet??

Oh btw Brian Kenny's legendary card had Bradley winning 8-4,but I guess he's too bias..Oh and btw,boxing is subjective,if you don' know that then your an idiot..The same kind of idiot who believes his opinion can change rec..No matter how much you wish,or hope,Bradley is still undeafeat..Sorry..