Tim Bradley v Amir Khan - who wins and how?

[LacedUp]

I respectfully disagree,,,

The bradley that fought abregu, peterson, alexander would have gotten into khan's ass... Judah didnt want none of khan... Bradley would have bum rushed him and outworked him to a decision,,, Bradley wants it more,, the intangibles give him the win IMO


Now, bradley crushes him

Whether or not Bradley would win is something we can disagree about and discuss.

But Bradley crushes him? When has Bradley ever 'crushed' anybody? He won't do anything like that to Khan, he's too short and his reach is too short to really do anything of damage to Khan. On top of that, he can hardly crack his way through a potato chip. He's one of the weakest punching champions i've ever seen at WW. I really struggle to think of anyone with less snap in their punches than Bradley. Malignaggi maybe, but that's probably it.

[PainfromUkraine]

Whether or not Bradley would win is something we can disagree about and discuss.

But Bradley crushes him? When has Bradley ever 'crushed' anybody? He won't do anything like that to Khan, he's too short and his reach is too short to really do anything of damage to Khan. On top of that, he can hardly crack his way through a potato chip. He's one of the weakest punching champions i've ever seen at WW. I really struggle to think of anyone with less snap in their punches than Bradley. Malignaggi maybe, but that's probably it.

Voting is really surprising - 0 votes for a Khan stoppage victory but 20 votes (same as decision votes win) for Tim to win by stoppage? No way feather fisted Tim get's a KO here, I really cannot see that, UD yes.

[lefthook2daliva]

Bradley roughs him up, wears him out and stops him late.

[Box-Office]

Khan wins a UD. Bradley is an excellent pro, but even with all his skills he cant faze Khan but when Khan will beat'em everyone will undermine him like they do his Maidana win. Ppl even justify Khan's loss to peterson as legit even though dude was on roids plus the reffing/judging.

Remember when Bradley "quacked" out vs Khan for a Pacquiao payday which was completely fine but ppl wet their pants and pull the moral high ground when Khan did that with Alexander. The level of hypocrisy is surreal.

[-MEGA-]

I don't think tim is as "feather fisted" as people think. It's not like the caliber of opponents bradley has been fighting for the last 5 yrs get k.o'd anyways. I mean c'mon the PAC knockout will be talked about for the next 10-20 years. And matthysse's ko of Peterson had everybody think he was super human.
I say bradley stops khan in 10....easy work.

[Rome-By-Ko]

I personally believe the Khan since the introduction of Virgil is a different lesser Khan than he used to be. maybe its a combination of the Garcia KO or the hesitant picking his shots tactics hes taught. This Khan loses to Bradley.

The Khan from the Wild card would beat Bradley.

Khan is the same Khan dude..With the same flaws..Bradley would have owed his azz no matter when they fought..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Khan wins a UD. Bradley is an excellent pro, but even with all his skills he cant faze Khan but when Khan will beat'em everyone will undermine him like they do his Maidana win. Ppl even justify Khan's loss to peterson as legit even though dude was on roids plus the reffing/judging.

Remember when Bradley "quacked" out vs Khan for a Pacquiao payday which was completely fine but ppl wet their pants and pull the moral high ground when Khan did that with Alexander. The level of hypocrisy is surreal.

Maybe because they are not the same thing..Bradley earned his shot,Khan did nothing at WW,has not had a meaningful win in two yrs..Oh and btw his last big fight he was stopped in..Not to mention beat 3 times within his career..I'm not one that believes losses should hold you back..I do however believe you should have to earn your shot..Which Bradley did and Khan has not..

[LacedUp]

I don't think tim is as "feather fisted" as people think. It's not like the caliber of opponents bradley has been fighting for the last 5 yrs get k.o'd anyways. I mean c'mon the PAC knockout will be talked about for the next 10-20 years. And matthysse's ko of Peterson had everybody think he was super human.
I say bradley stops khan in 10....easy work.

Worst excuse I've ever heard. He hasn't had a legit KO in nearly a decade. The man is as feather fisted as they come, despite being in ridiculous shape.

[LacedUp]

Maybe because they are not the same thing..Bradley earned his shot,Khan did nothing at WW,has not had a meaningful win in two yrs..Oh and btw his last big fight he was stopped in..Not to mention beat 3 times within his career..I'm not one that believes losses should hold you back..I do however believe you should have to earn your shot..Which Bradley did and Khan has not..

You are being a hypocrite, as per usual. You say Khan hasn't done anything at WW, and Bradley earned his shot, despite not having a single damn fight at WW? GTFO. That's double standards dude.

So Khan has lost twice in his career, he should have never lost to Peterson. And what about Bradley? Didn't he get schooled vs Pacquiao? Wasn't he on ***** street vs Provo? Didn't some people also think he lost to JMM?

Bradley is not some undefeated beast.

[-MEGA-]

Worst excuse I've ever heard. He hasn't had a legit KO in nearly a decade. The man is as feather fisted as they come, despite being in ridiculous shape.

These are facts bro! No excuses. Try and dispute em