Tweet
"What if I lose to Khan?" - Tim Bradley
-
-
Tim Bradley is more than capable of roughing Khan up and beating him up while he runs in much more convincing fashion than PEDerson did.Comment
-
Nothing to do with power it's just debunking your general validation of khan as some top fighter....Wtf... dude, just because Kendall stopped diaz, and diaz dropped Khan - it doesn't mean Bradley has power?
What the f logic is that?? haha.
He relinquished his shot at that title, I should have said. He was considered #1 after Alexander, but he didn't fight for the championship against Khan, so he was just #1 contender. After Khan beat Judah, many considered him to be #1 over Bradley, including the HBO team.Comment
-
Dude your an obvious detractor..It's clear as day..Bradley obviously has some pop..Who has run in on him and not paid a price..I'll wait..Wtf... dude, just because Kendall stopped diaz, and diaz dropped Khan - it doesn't mean Bradley has power?
What the f logic is that?? haha.
He relinquished his shot at that title, I should have said. He was considered #1 after Alexander, but he didn't fight for the championship against Khan, so he was just #1 contender. After Khan beat Judah, many considered him to be #1 over Bradley, including the HBO team.
Comment
-
When did he fight at WW?
Wtf are you talking about? I mentioned Pac, Holt, Garnica? Haha. 2 of which were before Pac, one was pac. Are you having trouble reading son?
Bradley didn't beat Pacquiao and was beaten from post to post by Provo. So no, he's not undefeated. Everyone except his nuthugging fans know that Bradley was completely outclassed against Pacquiao. There were boos around the arena after the decision, everyone had it 10-2 or 11-1. Except for rome-by-ko's legendary scorecard that had Bradley winning
How was it you put it? "Boxing is subjective".Comment
-
Bradley is too good on the inside and Khan has absolutely no inside game. Khan has good footwork on the outside but so does Bradley. Khan's big advantage is speed, but I don't think speed alone would negate Bradley's pressure. I have Tim by UD.Comment
-
Abregu... Which I would tab him to beat khan also.....When did he fight at WW?
Wtf are you talking about? I mentioned Pac, Holt, Garnica? Haha. 2 of which were before Pac, one was pac. Are you having trouble reading son?
Bradley didn't beat Pacquiao and was beaten from post to post by Provo. So no, he's not undefeated. Everyone except his nuthugging fans know that Bradley was completely outclassed against Pacquiao. There were boos around the arena after the decision, everyone had it 10-2 or 11-1. Except for rome-by-ko's legendary scorecard that had Bradley winning
How was it you put it? "Boxing is subjective".Comment
-
Oh, so you run out of things to back up your claim that Bradley is not featherfisted, so you go into a strange triangle theory about Holt > Diaz -> drop Khan = Bradley has power? hahaha. It was literally one of the worst arguments I've ever seen.
No it's not. He hasn't had a legit ko since 2007, despite fighting some fighters who could and should be stopped at world level.
But hey, "he almost dropped" a few right?
Comment
Comment