Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roger Mayweather: "Pacquiao Needs To KO Bradley In Rematch To Qualify For Mayweather"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Radical View Post
    i dont think Suge Knight could knock Bradley out
    You mean this Suge Knight?

    Comment


    • #42
      how about just tell ur nephew to fight pac instead?? if pac was to rematch bradley and looks good theres gonna be more accusation and so on.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by DAZED 2.0 View Post
        No. Just no.
        Yes, just yes. Especially to the beating Bradley part.

        Pacquiao is known for letting fighters coast to finish a fight on their feet. That's no mystery bro.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma View Post
          That would make the fight even bigger, but Pacquiao ain't beating Bradley in a rematch so
          Why wouldn't he? He pretty much dominated the first fight.

          As if you didn't know.

          Comment


          • #45
            I guess Amir Con qualified for a Mayweather bout by being ko,ed

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Jayallday9 View Post
              Roger is right. Before any fanboys get upset, pay attention to what he said...Nobody but Pac's die-hard fans think Pac EVER had a chance to beat Floyd and they never BELIEVED Pac could win, they just hoped and wished. Die-hard boxing fans do not believe that "Manny is back" just because he beat unranked, unskilled Brandon Rios!!

              Roger didn't say Pac NEEDS to k.o Tim, he's just saying that Bradley is a high profile fight for Manny and winning, especially by knockout would get that insane hype going again.
              Just lol,

              If Bradley gets defeated= roger says pac should fight canelo to earn a shot, neverending excuses from the ducks camp.

              I still can't get it with you fanboys,

              If pac is easy work why is your idol ducking?

              Easy work, easy money, huge money, massive ppv. What more can floyd "money" mayweather ask for.

              Floyds fans are the biggest disgrace in boxing, they want to protect the cowardice of floyd.

              Same feathers flock together

              Comment


              • #47
                this is ridiculous... i dont think ANY unbiased fan of boxing will agree with these conditions. add it to the list of conditions/roadblocks.

                lets be clear, pac should fight bradley next. period. simply for the fact of avenging the "loss". it has nothing to do with floyd. pac doesnt need to "qualify" for floyd at all. pac's resume and highlight reel already certified ATG status. only "qualifying" pac needs to do is revenue split.

                rios was just a showcase for pac's "comeback"... the same way a fat jmm was a showcase for floyd's "comeback" from retirement.

                the funny thing is this, all of team mayweather admit pac was robbed against tim... so they acknowledged pac's unofficial victory over tim. but yet theres a condition of having to KO tim just to be "worthy" of a floyd fight? c'mon son.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                  Yes, just yes. Especially to the beating Bradley part.

                  Pacquiao is known for letting fighters coast to finish a fight on their feet. That's no mystery bro.
                  Don't agree. He didn't lose the last three rounds because he was coasting. He lost them by getting outboxed.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    that's not necessarily true. getting a UD and winning every round is sufficient enough to qualify as an empressive win

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      it's pretty unreasonable, I'd like to see a taped recording of this though, or other sources, but if Roger did say this then **** him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP