Carl Froch proved he's almost at the level of (as he said) a domestic-level fighter. He should fight Degale next.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Froch: I Broke Groves Down, Ref Saved His Career!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Frank Ducketts View PostWe are talking about the stoppage. It was a bad stoppage. Froch fans, it was a bad stoppage. Damage control won't work here. Froch made it worse with his post fight idiotic rant.
Froch underestimated Groves and ALMOST paid the price. I'm not defending Froch; IMO, he looked ****e last night - cumbersome, sluggish and out of sorts.
Groves was exceptional early on, but was tiring after round 6. The referee denied Froch a legitimate stoppage.
Alas, **** happens.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GRANDSLAM View PostGeorge Groves exposed Carl Froch as a fighter and as a man, he's devoid of any self-awareness, humility or class. The most patronising man I've ever seen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fcastro1 View Postfroch must be the worst multiple champ of all time. terrible technique balance speed defence. and he is an arrogant ****. groved would have won if he wasnt so gungho and fought smarter like the first couple rounds. sorry im wrong the ref and judges would have ***ed him over anyway. **** froch he is so ****
Comment
-
I've watched round 7 four times now, the last of which I slowed the frame-rate down, to try and fathom how some have managed to score it for Froch and see it as a turning point.
He lands an uppercut in the clinch early on and a left as Groves leaves himself open. A small number of flicking jabs a scattered through the round. Other than that, he lands next to no clean shots. The punches that come in flurries land on Groves gloves.
He gets wobbled by a double jab at the beginning of the round, takes solid jabs to the face on a number of occasions, gets hit with a scoring left hook at close quarters while his own shots hit nothing but gloves, he takes a couple of big right hands and then is hit at the close with a double left hook and a right before forcing a straight left of his own amid landing on gloves then missing a right way wide of the mark.
So for anyone who scored that round for Froch, would you care to watch it again and give a breakdown on how you've got him winning that round? Because at the moment I can only conclude that it's down to wishful thinking coupled with the fact that it was an improvement on the sixth because he took less punishment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Djanxx View PostThe fool think's he's a superior fighter to Calzaghe LMAO
I personally think Groves would've held on for the round and took the next round off a bit, then it's anyones game.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yoz View PostAye, Frank, you're right.
Froch underestimated Groves and ALMOST paid the price. I'm not defending Froch; IMO, he looked ****e last night - cumbersome, sluggish and out of sorts.
Groves was exceptional early on, but was tiring after round 6. The referee denied Froch a legitimate stoppage.
Alas, **** happens.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gmc_rfc_06 View PostHe's not wrong.
He started landing in round 8, Groves was visibly tiring and then he was going to stop him in the 9th before the ref stepped in.
Credit to Groves for the first half, but it was becoming a Froch fight from 7-9 and he had him in bad shape. The ref has cost Froch a clear win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostBlade View PostFroch saving face because he got absolutely dropped in the first round and six rounds after that operated in zombie mode. Groves never went down at least and had the fight won. Groves probably would have survived and went on to win a decision most likely if not completely finish Froch. With all of this talking now Froch has to take the rematch knowing that Groves dropped him like a brick in the first fight and he can't go on saying anymore that he knocked down Groves in sparring.
So to say George "probably would have surfvived and went on to win a decision" is inaccurate.
Sadly for the Saint, fighting 4 people in a ring instead of 1 is a bit of a tough ask, especially when you're against somebody who take a punch like Froch (there was a stunning 3 shot salvo that I swear would decapitate any normal man, and Froch just stood there and took it, every shot clean and flush).
The only way Groves was winning that fight was by KO. Corrupt as hell, unfortunately. The ref and the judges knew which side their bread was buttered.
Comment
Comment