Carl Froch vs George Groves IBF SMW Title & Undercards Prediction Discussion Thread

[Rome-By-Ko]

Your argument is so ridiculous its untrue. You are actually insinuating that you are right because two of the judges scored the same as you.

How do you figure that?? I've never said that or alluded to that at all..You should know by now I don't give a fucck who agrees with me or not..That's a cowards mentality..I saw the fight as close, you did not..You claim I can't score because of this..I find that funny..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

How do you figure that?? I've never said that or alluded to that at all..You should know by now I don't give a fucck who agrees with me or not..That's a cowards mentality..I saw the fight as close, you did not..You claim I can't score because of this..I find that funny..

You alluded to the fact that your scores were "on point" with the judges so you should be a judge

You're a joke. An absolute fanboy. You wanted Froch to win so you gave him rounds. Just like Bradley-Pacquiao.

Stop hiding behind this "opinion" nonsense. Just because scoring is technically subjective doesn't mean you can just hide behind atrocious scorecards on the basis that it's your "opinion". Now THAT is a coward's mentality.

I just saw you say that you wouldn't care if someone called Haye-Wlad in favour of Haye. What is wrong with you?

[Kris Silver]

When did I ever say that Froch did not deserve a point being taken?? Or that Dirk was/or was not a Froch fan??I really should all you how old you are cause you're comprehension seems very poor tbh..

As too ya question of my age,I really don't see relevance in telling you my age..It has nothing to do with this thread or the conversation..

You seemed to challenge Dirk's scoring based on having an interest in scoring for Groves. That's clearly what many would take from how you worded it. He's a Froch fan but can be objective enough with his scoring. I realise you have Froch in your sig, and would definitely question your objectivity as many are doing.

I question your age because there's been so many ridiculous contradictions from yourself. Rather than even accepting just one, you defend and make more. That is a hall mark of a naive petulent child. If you were -20 I would have to say, I was like that...and cut you some slack. Seeing as it's another question you're ducking I'll just phase it out slightly seeing how cringing it's got. It's not like anyone is defending you either. You're in a vast minority on several points for good reason.

[Rome-By-Ko]

You alluded to the fact that your scores were "on point" with the judges so you should be a judge

You're a joke. An absolute fanboy. You wanted Froch to win so you gave him rounds. Just like Bradley-Pacquiao.

Stop hiding behind this "opinion" nonsense. Just because scoring is technically subjective doesn't mean you can just hide behind atrocious scorecards on the basis that it's your "opinion". Now THAT is a coward's mentality.

I just saw you say that you wouldn't care if someone called Haye-Wlad in favour of Haye. What is wrong with you?

Lmao,damn your comprehension skills are horrible, why would I care what someone else opinion is if that's what they believe..What's wrong with you..Do you believe yours to be the only opinion that matters?? Or you that ******??

I'm not hiding behind anything, and because I mention a fact, which was the judges scores were close or on par with mine, does not mean I alluded to anything..Just did what i normally do with the childish Dirk brush and laugh him off..

[Rome-By-Ko]

You seemed to challenge Dirk's scoring based on having an interest in scoring for Groves. That's clearly what many would take from how you worded it. He's a Froch fan but can be objective enough with his scoring. I realise you have Froch in your sig, and would definitely question your objectivity as many are doing.

I question your age because there's been so many ridiculous contradictions from yourself. Rather than even accepting just one, you defend and make more. That is a hall mark of a naive petulent child. If you were -20 I would have to say, I was like that...and cut you some slack. Seeing as it's another question you're ducking I'll just phase it out slightly seeing how cringing it's got. It's not like anyone is defending you either. You're in a vast minority on several points for good reason.

I really believe your about 14 you have some kinda team up mentality that makes you seem very weak my man..Nobody defending me?? Are I being serious with that comment..Lmao..Like i said when have i said the things you claimed I've said, the answer was never..So just stfu already..lmao..

[Kris Silver]

I really believe your about 14 you have some kinda team up mentality that makes you seem very weak my man..Nobody defending me?? Are I being serious with that comment..Lmao..Like i said when have i said the things you claimed I've said, the answer was never..So just stfu already..lmao..

I summarised but 3 of your points in the past 24 hours whereby people clearly undone your points and underlined your contradictions.

Adults go home and question why so many people whom have no reason or collusion, would do that...specifically to you and your various points.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Lmao,damn your comprehension skills are horrible, why would I care what someone else opinion is if that's what they believe..What's wrong with you..Do you believe yours to be the only opinion that matters?? Or you that ******??

I'm not hiding behind anything, and because I mention a fact, which was the judges scores were close or on par with mine, does not mean I alluded to anything..Just did what i normally do with the childish Dirk brush and laugh him off..

If someone believes something which is blatantly WRONG, then they are mentally ******ed. You don't encourage them to keep believing it. You should send them to the loony bin which is where I think you need to be.

I've seen your "criteria" for scoring fights. It's frankly laughable. You use meaningless terms like "carried the pace" and "he made the fight" and "it depends what ya like".

No dumbass, there is a set criteria for a reason. Clean punching, effective aggression, defence. There's no criteria called "carrying the pace". You're supposed to follow it and not make up what you like. Which area was Froch superior in for the first 8 rounds?

[CraigM]

If someone believes something which is blatantly WRONG, then they are mentally ******ed. You don't encourage them to keep believing it. You should send them to the loony bin which is where I think you need to be.

I've seen your "criteria" for scoring fights. It's frankly laughable. You use meaningless terms like "carried the pace" and "he made the fight" and "it depends what ya like".

No dumbass, there is a set criteria for a reason. Clean punching, effective aggression, defence. There's no criteria called "carrying the pace". You're supposed to follow it and not make up what you like. Which area was Froch superior in for the first 8 rounds?

I agree with Dirk...

[Rome-By-Ko]

If someone believes something which is blatantly WRONG, then they are mentally ******ed. You don't encourage them to keep believing it. You should send them to the loony bin which is where I think you need to be.

I've seen your "criteria" for scoring fights. It's frankly laughable. You use meaningless terms like "carried the pace" and "he made the fight" and "it depends what ya like".

No dumbass, there is a set criteria for a reason. Clean punching, effective aggression, defence. There's no criteria called "carrying the pace". You're supposed to follow it and not make up what you like. Which area was Froch superior in for the first 8 rounds?

It would depend on the rds were talking about..Carrying the pace is not a criteria, it's a description..One that actual judges use, out also has relevance..As I seen in how you score fights, it would be lost on you tho..When in a close Rd where fighters both have their moments you need to start looking at other things..Like who is making the fight, who is controlling the pace(aka who is controlling the fight), ring generalship..

One of the criteria you left out..In different rds Froch was the more active and cleaner puncher..I really thought outside of maybe 3 Rd there were a lot of close Rds..

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Ring Generalship was probably the criteria where Groves was most dominant