The GGG hate is outstanding

[-PBP-]

Precisely.

It's like if you don't say Golovkin is flawless then you "hate" him.

I've said that Golovkin would beat everyone at 160 outside of maybe Martinez. That's he's very difficult to beat and one of the hardest punchers in the sport.

The fact he showed a few weaknesses and I've highlighted them, that's describing as me hating the guy

Its crazy. After Rigo vs. Donaire numerous people were questioning Rigo's ability to fight inside. After Broner vs. Rees numerous people were questioning Broner's leaky defense, footwork and his ability to deal with movement. After Wilder's last fight people were criticizing him moving backwards in a straight line and his sloppy technique. All 3 fights the winner flat out dominated and was given props yet the criticisms were fair. This was no different.

You can learn things about a fighter no matter the level of opposition he is in the ring with. There is nothing wrong with pointing out a fighters flaws. If you disagree, point out why instead of screaming racism, nationalism, or whatever excuse you are trying to come up with to avoid having an intelligent boxing discussion.

Fanboys are so damn annoying.

[IronDanHamza]

Its crazy. After Rigo vs. Donaire numerous people were questioning Rigo's ability to fight inside. After Broner vs. Rees numerous people were questioning Broner's leaky defense, footwork and his ability to deal with movement. After Wilder's last fight people were criticizing him moving backwards in a straight line and his sloppy technique. All 3 fights the winner flat out dominated and was given props yet the criticisms were fair. This was no different.

You can learn things about a fighter no matter the level of opposition he is in the ring with. There is nothing wrong with pointing out a fighters flaws. If you disagree, point out why instead of screaming racism, nationalism, or whatever excuse you are trying to come up with to avoid having an intelligent boxing discussion.

Fanboys are so damn annoying.

Oh, yes.

You'd have loved the Chavez and Tyson era

[Russian Crushin]

Critiquing his skill set while still acknowledging that he beats everybody at 160 isn't hating. Its called boxing discussion. Just like people critique Broner, Wilder, Russell Jr., Alexander, Bradley, Berto or whoever else. The only "haters" you speak of are Stax on Deck and his 25 alts saying he is "an unskilled face first brawler hypejob" who probably isn't even a Broner fan to begin with.

Thats fine, but how many people on here are just as bad as the fan boy trolls but who's sole mission is to hate the guy? Every thread you entire you see alts and "haters" saying moronic stuff just to make Golovkin fans look bad. You know where the real fans on here are. But majority of people look at guy like thuggery's posts and say "i hate Golovkin for his fans" and then post trash just as bad as fan boys in response.

[-PBP-]

Oh, yes.

You'd have loved the Chavez and Tyson era

Oh god. I couldn't even imagine. Especially when Chavez hit 87-0.

Thats fine, but how many people on here are just as bad as the fan boy trolls but who's sole mission is to hate the guy? Every thread you entire you see alts and "haters" saying moronic stuff just to make Golovkin fans look bad. You know where the real fans on here are. But majority of people look at guy like thuggery's posts and say "i hate Golovkin for his fans" and then post trash just as bad as fan boys in response.

Hating a fighter because of his fans...even worse, hating a fighter because of how his fans represent themselves on a boxing forum is ****** no matter who it is. Especially when you don't even know who is real and who is a troll alt trying to get a rise out of people. Fans could be annoying but it shouldn't affect your view on a certain boxer. If anything, there is more talking about fighters' fans on this forum than the fighters themselves. Who gives a **** who the next man likes to watch?

But the numerous threads saying "WAA!!! WAAA!!! WAAA!!! Black people hate Golovkin WAAA!!!!" are ignorant and juvenile responses to legitimate threads discussing what they saw last night from a skills standpoint.

[King_]

STOP HATING! GGG good boys those guys out all in 6 rounds in the same night. You just hate him because he's not "slick".

Critiquing his skill set while still acknowledging that he beats everybody at 160 isn't hating. Its called boxing discussion. Just like people critique Broner, Wilder, Russell Jr., Alexander, Bradley, Berto or whoever else. The only "haters" you speak of are Stax on Deck and his 25 alts saying he is "an unskilled face first brawler hypejob" who probably isn't even a Broner fan to begin with.

To be fair that poster is supremely biased and has been making idiotic posts for months. he doesn't critique ****, his agenda is clear as day.

There is a lot of people who aren't clear who the 'haters" are, but that is definitely one of them, IMO.

[paulf]

Maybe they're Matthyse fans afraid of getting hurt again.

[Weltschmerz]

GGG is a fluid fighter, quite slick for a Russian. He displayed beautiful technique and boxing skill vs Stevens. He doesn't really deserve any hate, if you're a true boxing fan.

[Mr. Philadel]

The Triple G hate is minor....more dudes here respect his hands game than those who don't....quit the victim act ****....Triple G don't even register on the top 5 most hated here.... so that lil bit of hate he gets is far from outstanding

To accuse a certain group of posters of hating on dude for the same reasons another group loves him is just the twisted fake ass fraudulent NSB way

[junior gong]

'Hate', 'Hater', 'Haterz' etc. All that crap is annoying.

[RiC-DiC]

I'm a Floyd fan but I don't hate Golovkin. I'm a fan of em both.