Originally posted by carloscruz10009
View Post
numbers dont lie....
Cotto doesnt need roach to teach him defense, hes already agood defensive fighter. Cotto is adept at fighting moving backwards as in the margarito fight. The thing is theres no need to fight canelo moving backwards because hes not a pressure fighter or a volume puncher. Canelo is a cheap imitation of Floyd, at his best he is an elite counter puncher. Problem is its not easy to counter Cotto. Floyd tried and was not ableto counter Cotto consistently. Mayweather landed close to 50 percent of his shots on Canelo, while only landing 26 percent of his shots on Cotto . Cotto also through far more punches in his fight than canelo did in his, which gave Mayweather more chances to counter and he wasn't able to.
I wouldnt put too much stock in either of their performances against trout.
Canelo fought a very passive and defensive fight. Cotto landed more and out threw Canelo by a wide margin.it's a lot easier to be a efficient when you only throw four hundred and fifty punches
the truth is Canelo has never faced a true pressure fighter with the skill set of a Miguel Cotto.I believe Floyd Mayweather hurt Canela a couple of times and made him gun shy. I believe Austin trout hurt canelo to the body. I believe canelo has trouble making 154 and I believe Cotto would break him down and tko him.
Comment