there is NO BRAWLER IN THIS ERA THAT EVEN COME CLOSE TO HIS SKILL AND THAT INCLUDES ------------------->PAC
Julio Cesar Chavez was one of the slickest boxers ever.
Collapse
-
This simply isn't true, he wasn't a great defensive fighter, his defence at times was good but certainly not great, at times his defence was bad, Mayweather, Taylor, Lockridge, Whitaker and Laporte all found him very easily, even crappy fighters were hitting him aswell, Jacubumski was landing flush.
No he really wasn't there are many fighters who were far slicker moving forward, Duran was levels above him in that regard.
defense was never sr's forte, breaking down opponents , body punching in exchange of taking shots on the way in is .. he was not on duran's league...Comment
-
Comment
-
Great is a stretch but he was damn good defensively.
That's going too far, Chavez would have never gotten bombarded with punches the way Marquez did against Diaz and Katsidis, granted a prime Marquez primarily used his legs to defend but Chavez knew how to roll and smother his opponents.
In my honest opinion, off topic here but Chavez would have destroyed Pryor and I don't think it would be that competitive.Comment
-
Comparing past prime Marquez to prime Chavez isn't fair and it's still arguable even then.Comment
-
Chavez's skills are criminally underrated,,,
in his prime from 83-89 he was a thing machine,,,
he could bob and weave slightly to make a guy miss, and then crack with either hand,,
Chavez is one of the greatest fighters ever,,,, If you dont think that then You DKSABComment
-
Everybody lands on that juice head Marquez. Everybody. Look at how TURDSACK Jandeng left his face. Marquez's defense is waaaay overrated.Comment
Comment