Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

B.hops fought extermely dirty against Murat. Where the outcry?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    But everyone picks on Wlad wahhh. B-Hop uses his to make up his physical disadvantages.....Wlad has all the advantages and still does it cause he fights scared.... thats what this thread is about just be honest.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
      Yea well if I shoot you because you talked bad about my mom you wouldn't get in trouble I would lol. He hit bhop on the ground ffs there's no excuse for that. And people complain about him being boring that fight was entertaining as hell lol
      Look at this greasy little turd, giving bhop a pass for his 'veteran tricks'. Typical floboner.

      Comment


      • #43
        Too slick, too crafty










        ......To dirty.


        Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

        Comment


        • #44
          It was an entertainging fight. Hopkins wasn't as dirty as usual but he did use his head a lot like he normally does. Murat wasn't taking the crap and was giving it right back but he is too green to do it like Hopkins does.

          The action was better than the fouls this time around. I never liked the Hopkins nonesense

          Comment


          • #45
            outcry?



            after watching Bernard do this for the past 67yrs, we're kinda used to it already

            Comment


            • #46
              its part of the sport. i appreciate those subtle (and maybe sometimes not so subtle) dirty tricks that hopkins brings to the table. i thought murat held his own giving hopkins a taste of his own medicine, just wasnt as good at it.

              the way hopkins uses his head is pretty masterful. i dont know why, but it seems like its easier to pull off if you have a bald/shaved head. hop, holyfield, bradley

              Comment


              • #47
                As usual idiots exaggerating Hopkins style.

                He is who he is and he won that fight clearly. Get over it.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon View Post
                  As usual idiots exaggerating Hopkins style.

                  He is who he is and he won that fight clearly. Get over it.
                  So a foul isnt a foul when good ol' buttkins does it then, we get it..

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by junior gong View Post
                    So a foul isnt a foul when good ol' buttkins does it then, we get it..
                    There is a middle ground. Hopkins isnt a saint but he's not a fraud either. Understand?

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by WilkinsOlajuwon View Post
                      There is a middle ground. Hopkins isnt a saint but he's not a fraud either. Understand?
                      No there isnt a middle ground, Hopkins has been doing this for years and a ref like Smoger doesnt see it?? If I nut you or punch you in the bollocks its a foul. It really is that simple, and in Hopkins case refs already know he is likely to be pulling every trick in the book, so why isnt he getting called for it? Its a wonderful story that he is still fighting at his age, but he has been getting a handicap on fouls for too long now and if refs had more balls and pulled him on his nonsense, then the reality is he probably wouldnt still be fighting....certainly not at world title level anyway.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP