I like Bradley, but he's just not that good.

[UNiQU3]

Bradley has earned his elite status.. Yeah, he doesn't have that one gleaming attribute that sticks out at you - well actually he does - HEART. Dude's solid all-around and has a warrior mentality. Won me over after the Provo fight.

[Rome-By-Ko]

His win over Hopkins didn't do anything for his ranking.

I don't think Holt's ever been in the Top 5 at Jr WW.

Don't get the rest of your post. You don't have to beat someone to be ranked ahead of them.

Holt had a good 08 yr..Beating Torres and Hopkins..Paulie M had loss to Diaz,and Herman Ngoudjo had loss to Urango..which in tern had change the landscape of the rankings..Moving Urango and Holt up..

[IronDanHamza]

Dude,Alexander was not ranked in 09 he had not beat anybody to be ranked..He'd also not been on TV..

Khan was making noise in 09,not enough noise to be ranked 2 behind Bradley and in front of Hatton..Makes no sense bro..I never said you have to beat a fighter to be ranked in front of a fighter...Alexander's claim to fame and what got people to take notice was his fight with Urango..How could he be ranked above him before fighting him??It just does not make sense,and shows you that this link,can not be taking seriously..

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...9#post14238809

This one right here that ya posted..

He was ranked in 09 after he beat Witter for his Vacant belt and got his name on the Map.

Khan won his Title off Kotelnik to get that rankings.

Right or wrong, these are the rankings you're going by when you say "Top 5 guys".

And Bradley beat two and Khan beat three.

[IronDanHamza]

Holt had a good 08 yr..Beating Torres and Hopkins..Paulie M had loss to Diaz,and Herman Ngoudjo had loss to Urango..which in tern had change the landscape of the rankings..Moving Urango and Holt up..

He's still not been Top 5 though.

And even if he had he's still not beaten more than Khan at 140.

[jas]

i like tim but hes not ppv no. 3

[Rome-By-Ko]

He was ranked in 09 after he beat Witter for his Vacant belt and got his name on the Map.

Khan won his Title off Kotelnik to get that rankings.

Right or wrong, these are the rankings you're going by when you say "Top 5 guys".

And Bradley beat two and Khan beat three.

Khan beat 3??When did he do this,and were the fighters??

[Rome-By-Ko]

He's still not been Top 5 though.

And even if he had he's still not beaten more than Khan at 140.

How,Kotelnik and Maidana??I really don't believe Paulie was top 5 when they fought..I'd have to do more research to be positive..I'm fairly sure of it tho..

[IronDanHamza]

How,Kotelnik and Maidana??I really don't believe Paulie was top 5 when they fought..I'd have to do more research to be positive..I'm fairly sure of it tho..

Go and read back this very thread and I've told you how Pauli was ranked #5.

If we give questionable Holt the benefit of the doubt then they both have three.

[Juof]

Bradley is a man of many attributes but a master of none. Well rounded with a huge heart and mind

[Rome-By-Ko]

BTW,Khan was never ranked ahead of Hatton..He was ranked 3rd behind Hatton before Hatton retired..Khan was never a higher rank tho..