how would Floyd Mayweather of 2006/07 do against these fighters?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GOD-FR33
    "SRL is tha G.O.A.T."
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 3022
    • 284
    • 495
    • 9,840

    #21
    Good post.

    Exactly what I was thinking. I agree totally. Check out my post as well.

    Comment

    • blacraven
      Protected
      • May 2007
      • 670
      • 45
      • 43
      • 7,557

      #22
      Originally posted by joeboy1983
      point 1- I get not liking floyd but to say that a guy who we have only seen hit flush a few times is going to get knocked out is sorta reckless.

      point 2 - You can't pick a fantasy fight where one guy is at his best and the other isn't, any way, at floyd's best he is a defensive wizard with cat like reflexes. Like him or not, he's not getting knocked out. He's 36 and guys can't hit him, so you expect me to believe when he's 25-30 somebody is going to just blow him away in 2 rounds..GTFOH..

      point 3- Hearns didn't knock out Leonard, he's not knocking out floyd. Floyd would be moving. Truth said.

      point 3- Sweet pea had great reflexes and head movement. If you watch floyd, he had great footwork, great reflexes, and great defense. .. and yes they are all different categorizes.

      point 4- I'm not saying he would be undefeated but Call him what you want but with his combination of skills he would be hard to beat in any era, and not one guy would blow right thru him, not even the haters believe that. it doesn't matter if you agree with the truth.


      C'mon give the guy an ounce of credit
      Wow, someone that actually has common sense and is not letting blind hatred cloud their judgment......There is hope.

      You sir are my hero.
      [IMG]http://i170.***********.com/albums/u243/jorge1087/GIFs/joker_clap.gif#joker%20clap%20gif[/IMG]

      Comment

      • freethinkersam
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Aug 2013
        • 247
        • 34
        • 2
        • 6,374

        #23
        He loses a close but clear decision to De la Hoya.

        I've not seen enough of Hearns to make a call.

        Sweet Pea would be a boring fight which could go either way.

        Pacquiao would give him all he could handle, that's a 50/50 fight. It was because of Pacquiao that Floyd suddenly preached RANDOM TESTING - that's how amazing Pacquiao looked.

        Floyd is a product of his time. A great boxer. And a pretty decent guy when you look into his eyes. But his glorified sparring session sent me to sleep.

        In order for Mayweather to be considered an all-time great, he has to fight BRADLEY & PACQUIAO.

        Comment

        • freethinkersam
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Aug 2013
          • 247
          • 34
          • 2
          • 6,374

          #24
          Originally posted by GOD-FR33
          Let's get one thing straight. Floyd is a coward and insecure about his own talents. That is why his entourage is so large to begin with. He wouldn't step near a ring with any of these fighters. PERIOD. He loses to all of them. A prime Oscar was good at using his size and legs. He would have outpointed Floyd for a decision. Hearns is one of the strongest two fisted punchers in history, ala Felix Trinidad and would have murdered Floyd. Who do you think Floyd is? An all-time great? He is not. He is good at match-making. Whitaker is the true greatest defensive fighter of all-time and had a better jab, better legs, and you couldn't hit him with ANYTHING. Not a jab, not to the body. People calling Floyd the greatest defensive fighter in history are young and dumb! Floyd is susceptible to a good jab. He gives you his body. He was marked up by Cotto and Cotto wouldn't have touched Whitaker. I think we know who wins the Floyd/Pacquiao fight as well. If he thought he could win, with the amount of money at stake for that fight, Guess what? He would have taken the fight!!! He didn't because he knew his hands would've been full and that he could've have possibly lost. Floyd is over-rated and a product of the times. In another era, he'd have 3 or four losses facing the best. Defense can only get you so far against B-level competition. All of these fighters are extremely active and efficient for 12 rounds. One of Floyd's problem against ATG's would've been his low punch rate. Duran and probably Chavez beats him because of this as well. His chin is good BUT how good? If any of these fighters hit him for 12, could he take it like they could?
          It's this kind of insight that makes me want to look at the forums on boxingscene.

          Comment

          • Alec900
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 4163
            • 128
            • 86
            • 11,354

            #25
            he would take a vacation

            Comment

            • GOD-FR33
              "SRL is tha G.O.A.T."
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 3022
              • 284
              • 495
              • 9,840

              #26
              Thanks man.

              Thanks man. I call everything for what it is. I am not a fan boy or unrealistic fan. I am an honest and fair respecter of the sport.

              Comment

              • J The UnBiased
                Banned
                • Mar 2010
                • 2868
                • 136
                • 0
                • 3,099

                #27
                Hearns by KO
                contrary to popular belief, Pea/Floyd would be entertaining, I got Floyd by UD
                He beats Oscar in a very competitive fight
                Floyd UD 12 over Pac

                Comment

                • Eg714
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 154
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  • 6,445

                  #28
                  Floyd would beat all of them IMO.

                  I use to think that hearns, PAC, and Oscar would ko Floyd but he's just to smart for any of them. He would do what ever it takes to win.

                  Sweet pea would be his toughest fight but Floyd would take a descion no doubt.

                  Comment

                  • Alec900
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 4163
                    • 128
                    • 86
                    • 11,354

                    #29
                    I have never seen Floyd lose a fantasy fight

                    Comment

                    • .Mexico.
                      Banned
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Oct 2013
                      • 467
                      • 53
                      • 20
                      • 594

                      #30
                      Originally posted by CatchweightKing
                      would not fight.

                      close thread.


                      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                      /Thread
                      /Thread
                      /Thread
                      /Thread

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP