Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I am rewatching all of Marquez' losses....

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
    Fact is the objective media had 3 choices-A, B, and C. Of those choices, most of the media picked:

    A- JMM won 57
    B -Manny won 51
    C-Draw-36

    They are 3 seperate choices. A, B, and C. no a&b and B&c.

    Again, you are trying to make it seem like judges have 2 choices-winning and losing. They don't. They have 3 choices winning, losing and draw. To make manny look better you are trying to count draws and winning together because it is the ONLY way that is achieved.


    That you are so desperate to try and make manny look as good as possible is pathetic. If Manny wasn't involved in the fight you wouldn't be doing this.
    You're struggling really hard with something very simple:

    1. 57 had JMM winning
    2. 87 did not have JMM winning

    2 are in a solid majority. Most obviously did NOT have him winning. 87 > 57.

    Which point confuses you?

    Comment


    • #52
      I had Marquez winning by Knockout in the Mayweather fight.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
        You're struggling really hard with something very simple:

        1. 57 had JMM winning
        2. 87 did not have JMM winning

        2 are in a solid majority. Most obviously did NOT have him winning. 87 > 57.

        Which point confuses you?
        So, 51 had manny winning and 93 did not have manny winning. What's your point?

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
          You're struggling really hard with something very simple:

          1. 57 had JMM winning
          2. 87 did not have JMM winning

          2 are in a solid majority. Most obviously did NOT have him winning. 87 > 57.

          Which point confuses you?
          what confuses is me is why you are grouping choices b & c together just To try and make manny look better.

          There are 3 choices A, B, and C. After voting the results are A>B>C, yet in your post you decide to interpret it as (B+C)>A.

          Comment


          • #55
            Marquez lost to Bradley (by a close margin) and to Mayweather.

            The first Marquez-Pacquiao fight could have gone either way.

            Second Pacquiao fight I felt that Marquez edged it out, but the knock down hurt him, so I could see some feeling that Pacquiao fight.

            He was definitely robbed in Pacquiao 3, v. Chris John, and v. Norwood.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by DonMega View Post
              So, 51 had manny winning and 93 did not have manny winning. What's your point?
              I never said most had Pac winning. In fact see post above, I clearly say that most had it for JMM or draw (same for Pac or draw). I'm simply correcting a guy that claims most had JMM winning, who's obviously wrong since 87 > 57

              Comment


              • #57
                Marquez beat Bradley? Haha

                And why do people keep saying Marquez won the 3rd fight vs Pacquiao? The fkin guy didnt get rob. Blame him for listening to his trainer telling him that he was winning the fight. After he heard Nacho say that he stopped doing ****.


                Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
                  what confuses is me is why you are grouping choices b & c together just To try and make manny look better.

                  There are 3 choices A, B, and C. After voting the results are A>B>C, yet in your post you decide to interpret it as (B+C)>A.
                  I'm grouping them cause these are mutually exclusive. You claim A, B is what's true, B if true if and only if A is false. This is logic 101

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View Post
                    Marquez beat Bradley? Haha

                    And why do people keep saying Marquez won the 3rd fight vs Pacquiao? The fkin guy didnt get rob. Blame him for listening to his trainer telling him that he was winning the fight. After he heard Nacho say that he stopped doing ****.


                    Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                    Floyd fanboys also had Bradley schooling Pacquiao, even though the Mayweathers all said Pac was robbed.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by HeroBando
                      Quote:

                      Originally Posted by Luilun

                      So that's 3 robberies, I have the same with addition to 2 more Pac fights for a total of 5

                      Dude you're cheapening the word "robbery". It's not a robbery if it's scored 50/50 by ringside experts. Cause robberies need near consensus, by definition. So much crying about bogus robberies, when a real robbery happens nobody will care, like the boy that cried wolf.
                      I don't think these people know what a robbery is... Or maybe just play dumb to suit their agendas.

                      Lara-Williams
                      Abril-Rios

                      Those were robberies!



                      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP