I am rewatching all of Marquez' losses....

[HeroBando]

NO-you already agreed a, b, and c are mutually exclsuive. Now you are saying b and c are part of the same group. they are not. They never will be because in a professional fight there are not 2 outcomes there are 3 outcomes.

A draw does not equal JMM didn't win. A draw does not equal Manny didn't win. A draw is a unique outcome all its own and therefore can't be combined with, nor is it a subset of, the other outcomes.

A draw certainly implies JMM didn't win on your card. You should step away when you're forced to argue otherwise. This is sigworthy stuff, you understand?

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

If 57 had JMM and 51 had Pacquiao winning how the fk is it a robbery?

We should poll the media and see what they would say about Mayweather-Castillo 1. Ohohoho flowmos would not like that at all. Haha


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[The Big Dunn]

A draw certainly implies JMM didn't win on your card. You should step away when you're forced to argue otherwise. This is sigworthy stuff, you understand?

A draw doesn't imply anything. It is a specific result that means there was no winner in the fight.

[The Big Dunn]

If 57 had JMM and 51 had Pacquiao winning how the fk is it a robbery?

We should poll the media and see what they would say about Mayweather-Castillo 1. Ohohoho flowmos would not like that at all. Haha


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

I don't know how it is. I never said anything regarding a robbery. I don't know who said JMM got robbed. I thought manny won the fight.

[The Big Dunn]

I'm grouping them cause these are mutually exclusive. You claim A, B is what's true, B if true if and only if A is false. This is logic 101

A draw certainly implies JMM didn't win on your card. You should step away when you're forced to argue otherwise. This is sigworthy stuff, you understand?

When you say a draw implies JMM didn't win, does that meet the criteria you posted above?

[Adamjr91]

Anyone that scored the Marquez-Bradley fight to Marquez should get a 6 month ban from this site.

Marquez loaded up with all his punches, missed then got countered all night long against Bradley.

[HeroBando]

When you say a draw implies JMM didn't win, does that meet the criteria you posted above?

Yeah of course. Having either Pac winning or a draw means you didn't have JMM winning. Conversely, if you had JMM winning, you didn't have Pac winning or a draw. Jeeze man, I can't believe you can't process this. I know you're not this dense, I don't think anybody on NSB is, and that's saying something

[ModernTalking]

I was actually scoring the 3rd fight for JMM but like I said, once Nacho started telling him he was winning he stopped doing his thing. I don't think anything annoys me more than people saying Marquez was robbed in that fight.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

Peps act like Marquez won that fight easily. Marquez was winning the fight and the tide was going his way going into the 9th but suddenly in the championship rounds he just stopped pressing the action and let PAC back into the fight.

[The Big Dunn]

Yeah of course. Having either Pac winning or a draw means you didn't have JMM winning. Conversely, if you had JMM winning, you didn't have Pac winning or a draw. Jeeze man, I can't believe you can't process this. I know you're not this dense, I don't think anybody on NSB is, and that's saying something

Having either (B) Pac winning or (C) a draw means you didn't have (A) JMM winning.
Conversely, if you had (a) JMM winning, you didn't have (b)Pac winning or (c) a draw.

Other than to make this look as good as possible for manny, why do you continue to group b and c together after saying they were mutually exclusive? you are violating the parameters you yourself set up.

Making them mutually exclusive, as you say they are; then its

Having A you don't have B or C
Having b you don't have a or C
Having c you don't have a or b

Put it like this in the bolded above, lets say I scored the fight A draw. I have niether pac nor JMM winning. You equate it above to not having only 1 of them not winning.

The draw is never about only one of the fighters, its about both, thats why your argument is incorrect.

[Twako]

57+51+36=144 media scores

when you say most of media scores, you have to have at a minimum 73. sure jmm had an edge in media scorers favoring him over pac, but it's not MOST of all media scorers. this aint no ****in robbery

castillo-mayweather1 was more of a robbery.