Comments Thread For: Pacquiao's Adviser Devalues Bradley For "Boring" Win
Collapse
-
boring or not. bradley still out boxes pacIt all hinges on How Pac does with Rios. Bradley is good, but Boring...
Without JMM's, Fan Base, Bradley, had no PPV potential, and a disinterested
Manny, got Robbed, by Brad, and Chopped by JMM.
Be interesting to see
If He can get the eye of the Tiger back against Brandon?Comment
-
Yep thats why they are trying to brush Tim off , I dont believe they will put Manny in with a live WW , they are going to try and get a ticket to a Mayweather fight by fighting B grade fighters , the first real WW they put Manny in from here on in will beat him .
Tim Bradley will beat Manny clearly thats why they dont want it .Comment
-
Haha if a prime (which Bradley is) Manny ever had the chance to fight a 40 year old Marquez (which Bradley did) he would have knocked Juan out. Its apples and oranges my friend.Bradley got what Pac never could, a decisive win over JMM, now they act like that's not worth anything. This fight makes sense, but they know Bradley would win again. That's why Arum and Koncz are avoiding it.
If this is how he's treated by his promoter, with Arum giving him a shot at Rios but protecting his cash cow.Then Bradley should leave TR ASAPComment
-
Another IF post , I dont think Manny would ever have an easy time with Juan , his style suits JMM .
And Bradley has improved from when he fought Manny so is he prime or still improving .Comment
-
Comment
-
What you're failing to realize that that Floyd was relatively unchallenged during that time while in the minds of many, Pac was beaten on several occassions during the same time period. Plus, Pac's trilogy with Moales was a joke. Would you pick the Barrera that Pac fought to beat the Chico that Floyd fought? And outside of those, they pretty much fought the exact same opponents with Floyd fighting younger and fresher versions of each. Like I said, I don't put a lottastock in all of those awards because they're mostly popularity contests.why are you getting so butthurt about the award? LOL. do you understand what fighter of the decade means? 2000-2009. lets compare:
floyd: corrales, castillo, judah, oscar, hatton, jmm
pac: barerra, jmm, morales, oscar, hatton, cotto
its fair to see why they gave the edge to pac. whats the controversy? what you are whining about is floyd being considered the best fighter of the era, and the fact that maybe some people dont agree with you.
IMO, its a tough choice... easy answer is floyd, he is still undefeated and is performing at the top of his game. although, pac made a bigger splash and it was a frenzy while it lasted, he put the excitement back in boxing.Comment
-
Comment