Comments Thread For: Juan Manuel Marquez: These Decisions Hurt Boxing!

[MDPopescu]

This is getting sad. I wanted Juan to lose since be was a ***** about testing. Now I'm extra glad he got beat

Yes. This was a "likeability" factor in this fight... I didn't care about Bradley before... But I've noticed that he undertook VADA testing, while Marquez never mentioned the issue..

[fcastro1]

You do the math. With out drugs he fought a 12 round fight with a prime fighter that was very close.

You dont think JMM could knock out Pac with out drugs lol Please

marquez didnt come close to koing pac in the featherweights. clottey margarito and cotto couldnt knock pac down. then comes marquez looking like a mini tyson and his drug cheat trainer kos pac. marquez is a cheat

[cabalas]

Never said he didn't outwork Marquez, it was a close fight man. What I'm saying is that the fight had little action bro and it wasn't Because of Marquez. Bradley did what he had to, that being said, Bradely did not school Marquez, he simply played it safe.

I agree with this 100 %. This was indeed a close fight (neither JMM nor Bradley dominated convincingly although Bradley was more active). I also agree with the poster who refers to the subjectivity in judging since Marquez landed more power punches while Bradley landed more jabs. What was the criteria when Boner "defeated" Malignaggi? Many here wrote that the higher output of punches of Paul was not enough to win because the more telling punches were on Broner's side. Thus, sometimes you have the more active or busier fighter "convincingly" winning while other times a boxer can't be rewarded with a victory even when he lands more punches than his rival. It shows that judging in boxing is clearly subjective.

[radiotracer]

You do the math. With out drugs he fought a 12 round fight with a prime fighter that was very close.

You dont think JMM could knock out Pac with out drugs lol Please

i think he tried three previous times with no success. now he teams up with memo and he's a knockout artist. he didn't look that massive on the last weigh in like he did on the last pac fight. i guess they knew the heat was on.

[Derranged]

Marquez, the Americans have cheated lots of other times but you can totally trust them this time..........NOT! LOL!

I have an official letter for Marquez from the American boxing establishment swearing that even though Americans have robbed him alot of times that they swear he can trust them this time.

LOL! ****** Americans are saying "the other times we robbed you but you can trust us this time" and taking offense that he thinks he was robbed? You're too damn ****** to know what you're sowing(and I can't wait to see you reap)! Even in fights that Mexicans will lose we will think we won because Americans have blurred the lines of truth and reality. JM Marquez won this fight and using infantile tactics like name calling isn't going to pressure us into agreeing. Pffft! GTFOH! LOL!

Americans, you've cheated Mexicans in alot of fights but if you promise that you're being honest this time we'll believe you 100%...............Estas loco tu guey!!!! LOL!

LOL! I'm trying to be discredited by American sleaze bags. I can't get more credible than that! YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!:

Holy frijoles seniores, I think we diverted the Americanos into Truthville and they no liking it.

[BOLLOCKS]

[awara]

Mexican star Juan Manuel Marquez (55-7-1, 40KOs) is still very upset with Saturday twelve round split decision loss to WBO welterweight champion Timothy Bradley (31-0, 12KOs) at the Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas. Two judges sided with Bradley, giving him the win with scores of 115-113 and 116-112. The third scored the fight for Marquez with a tally of 115-113. Marquez felt two of the judges robbed him of a win.
[Click Here To Read More]

ped is also hurting boxing

[jpage42]

The Americans have cheated Mexicans in lots of fights but I can tell that they can be trusted this time....... I don't think so! LOL!

Since when in the history of all time has a black fighter been given the overwhelming benefit of the doubt against a Mexican fighter, by American judges? Never knew America was so pro African American...Please. Did they rob Canelo v Trout? Or how about Chavez v Whitaker? Diaz v Malignaggi? Gimme a break! Marquez lost, move on. His "robberies" weren't even against Americans unless Manny Pacquiao was secretly nationalized. Ridiculous.

[Los Zetas]

Shut up calling him a whiner.

Most of you fools said he beat Pac 3 times before the 4th because he had it on a tee. That was a whine. By you fans who followed that statement you help add to his whiney personality.

Pac drew with him, and then beat him in a SD. The third was a lost to PAC, but again the first two were close...

[Los Zetas]

Oh and this will hurt JMM much like how Bradley said he won by 4 rounds after viewing it.

If Bradley had said it was very close, and could have gone either way, he would have got more love.