Comments Thread For: Marquez: Only a Close Win Could Have Made Pacquiao 5

[Bigg Rigg]

Ok look JMM got the big ko n doesn't wanna give PAC a chance to redeem himself. Kinda looks wack. I get it though, he and his fans think he won the previous three too. I don't that's why i think it's wack that he finally won and is like ok no rematch. IMO the 4th fight was probably the best fight so I wouldn't mind seeing them fight again.

[Erik1984]

I AGREE WITH YOU... PLUS LET'S SHUT THIS PACT-ARDOS DIDN'T MARQUEZ SAID HE WOULD GIVE PACQUIAO A REMATCH AS LONG AS HE GOT AT LEAST 50/50 Share. But PACQUIAO came and offered MARQUEZ 15 millions. That's not and even share for the guy that just put you to sleep in front of millions of people...... MAYBE PACQUIAO DOESN'T THINK A REMATCH IS WORTH an even share. For the guy that wasn't help by the judges to win.... To put you to SLEEP LIKE A BABY AFTER A WARM BATH.... HERE """BABY BABY""""YOUR PACIFIER AND SWEET DREAMS.

[brick wall]

Ok look JMM got the big ko n doesn't wanna give PAC a chance to redeem himself. Kinda looks wack. I get it though, he and his fans think he won the previous three too. I don't that's why i think it's wack that he finally won and is like ok no rematch. so I wouldn't mindIMO the 4th fight was probably the best fight seeing them fight again.

watching that fight, i was thinking...looks like pac will finally have a decisive win over jmm with the way he was outboxing marquez until that fateful last seconds of the 6th round...bell already rang for the last 10 seconds, pac dropped his guard and attacked jmm and boom...very ****** move by pac.

[billeau2]

Well, what do we know about what already happened is exactly why it can be controversial. We saw the events that went on, and those events were controversial because they caused a public disagreement on many questions, now you linked to my examples of future questions, but you can quite easily apply those examples to the present/past i.e. would Marquez have won the fight if he didn't land that punch? Would he have knocked Pacquaio out regardless in a later round? Now I know what you could say to counter this, which is basically that if you have those kinds of thoughts you could call anything controversial, but I think I'm safe in saying controversy would apply to a large sample of disagreement, and the conditions would actually have to in someway agree with the logic of certain peoples disagreements, which throws Duns ****** example of his opinion on Hatton winning rounds, which is supported by absolutely nothing.

Wrong questions.....Hope you don't doom me to potential housefires but ask yourself WHY....WHY did Marquez decide to fight with that strategy? Maybe because as he pointed out in the past, there was no way he felt he could get a fair decision. Marquez already outboxed Pacquio... numerous times

[hitking]

I understamd why JMM feels the way he does about a 5th Pac fight. But if he convincingly beat Bradley, which I have my doubts about. A 5th fight with Pac is the only fight that makes sense at this stage of his career. There's absolutely no point in a rematch with the best fighter in his division (Floyd Mayweather.) The Alvarado-Provodnikov winner does nothing for his legacy. Anyone else of any consequence at or around his division fights for GBP. If he's gonna fight on, Pac is the only fight that makes sense.

[sterling]

JMM is a sore loser and a poor winner

Hit the nail on the head. Ive lost alot of respect for JMM. He basically said "i got a lucky punch and dont want to rematch because i will lose" ****ing kid. Pac gave him multiple rematches when he had nothing to prove.

If anything he needs to prove that wasnt a lucky punch but we all know it was because pacman was whooping that ass.

He just wants to run away with his win like a child/poor winner indeed.

No respect for pacman even though pac has gave him chances and paydays with respect.

JMM is not one of my favs anymore because of him being a pretty crap bloke.

[Fetta]

I understamd why JMM feels the way he does about a 5th Pac fight. But if he convincingly beat Bradley, which I have my doubts about. A 5th fight with Pac is the only fight that makes sense at this stage of his career. There's absolutely no point in a rematch with the best fighter in his division (Floyd Mayweather.) The Alvarado-Provodnikov winner does nothing for his legacy. Anyone else of any consequence at or around his division fights for GBP. If he's gonna fight on, Pac is the only fight that makes sense.

Is JMM with TR or zanfer?

[mex602]

I'm a Pac fan, and I wouldn't hate him wanting the 5th fight, but I don't particularly want it. Neither of these guys have many fights left, and I want something new with those fights.

yes

pac vs money if pac destroys bam bam

[mex602]

Ok look JMM got the big ko n doesn't wanna give PAC a chance to redeem himself. Kinda looks wack. I get it though, he and his fans think he won the previous three too. I don't that's why i think it's wack that he finally won and is like ok no rematch. IMO the 4th fight was probably the best fight so I wouldn't mind seeing them fight again.

or how about pac destroy cotto again

[whoseyourdaddy]

JMM is a sore loser and a poor winner

Daaaaaammmm JMM spoke like a boss!!!! and put acid into PacFarts wounds Ouch!!!