Anyone here still thinks Joe Louis beats Wlad?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SweetScience
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2004
    • 1313
    • 64
    • 5
    • 8,455

    #1

    Anyone here still thinks Joe Louis beats Wlad?

    I've been reading for years on message boards, members claiming Louis would defeat Wlad, despite the fact he was a twink compared to Wladdy....

    Their thoughts have been clouded by the fact Louis has that record of title defenses. They fail to realize times have changed, weight training, science etc. Not saying Louis wasn't great but the sheer size and skill of Wlad would be too much to overcome.
    Last edited by SweetScience; 10-06-2013, 03:37 PM.
  • SN!PER
    locked and loaded
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2009
    • 23139
    • 1,204
    • 769
    • 107,506

    #2
    Joe Louis was 6'2", 215 lbs., too small to escape the hug of death.

    Comment

    • crold1
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2005
      • 6347
      • 324
      • 122
      • 19,304

      #3
      Yup. Still think so.

      Comment

      • SweetScience
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2004
        • 1313
        • 64
        • 5
        • 8,455

        #4
        Originally posted by crold1
        Yup. Still think so.
        You're convinced from books you've read?

        That easy huh?

        Comment

        • BTL
          AvE
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2008
          • 3609
          • 177
          • 406
          • 11,232

          #5
          way too small.

          Comment

          • crold1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 6347
            • 324
            • 122
            • 19,304

            #6
            Originally posted by SweetScience
            You're convinced from books you've read?

            That easy huh?
            Louis isn't Greb. There is actual film of almost every title fight fight he had, including against some much bigger men. A bunch of pre-title fights too. You should watch some.

            Comment

            • ROSS CALIFORNIA
              Tyson fan
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 69864
              • 997
              • 1,956
              • 113,453

              #7
              Too much of a size difference. Its like comparing 185 lb Marciano to a 220 lb Tyson.

              Comment

              • SweetScience
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2004
                • 1313
                • 64
                • 5
                • 8,455

                #8
                Originally posted by crold1
                Louis isn't Greb. There is actual film of almost every title fight fight he had, including against some much bigger men. A bunch of pre-title fights too. You should watch some.
                I've seen him in action

                He was too small and that stance of his would have him seeing the canvas soon

                I'm not convinced, don't see it

                I tend to lean towards fighters of the past as well

                Louis would lose

                Sorry

                Comment

                • Cutthroat
                  SOG Ward 32-0
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 7840
                  • 403
                  • 342
                  • 47,242

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SweetScience
                  I've been reading for years on message boards, members claiming Louis would defeat Wlad, despite the fact he was a twink compared to Wladdy....

                  Their thoughts have been clouded by the fact Louis has that record of title defenses. They fail to realize times have changed, weight training, science etc. Not saying Louis wasn't great but the sheer size and skill of Wlad would be too much to overcome.
                  Weight training doesn't make you a better boxer, doesn't make you punch harder, doesn't make you punch faster. Strength training is good for wrestling like what we saw yesterday, a fight where Wlad should've been disqualified.

                  The only thing boxers have benefitted from is better knowledge of nutrition and medicine, they still use many of the same training techniques they used to.

                  Have you learned nothing from watching boxing? Bradley should be a monster hitter due to his build, cruisers shouldn't be saying Golovkin hits like a HW, a toothpick like Pavlik shouldn't have been able to KO muscle bound guys like he did etc.


                  A guy built like Sanders beat Wlad, that dudes has like the most average body type ever, you wouldn't know he was even an athlete unless he told you.

                  Comment

                  • crold1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2005
                    • 6347
                    • 324
                    • 122
                    • 19,304

                    #10
                    Originally posted by SweetScience
                    I've seen him in action

                    He was too small and that stance of his would have him seeing the canvas soon

                    I'm not convinced, don't see it

                    I tend to lean towards fighters of the past as well

                    Louis would lose

                    Sorry
                    That's cool. I'm convinced. We can just disagree.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP