Klitschko appreciation thread
Collapse
-
how about ottke and calzaghe? if only they were brothers imagine how great they would be...
ottke and calzaghe won 42 title fights in a row. ottke and calzaghe are on an 80 fight winning streak. ottke and calzaghe were co-champions for a combined 16 years. ottke and calzaghe have a 100 percent win ratio.Comment
-
Who the heck is john & ottke.. we're talking heavyweight champions of the world here.. you can do better than that.Comment
-
they have a longer reign than the klitschko's and they never lost, and you don't even know who they are lol. shows you just how "great" the klitshko's combo-championship run is. hint-not at allComment
-
We're talking... same blood here & funny how you didn't list there stoppage rates.. neither could stop a fly... I meant flyweight.. excuse me.. hahahaha.how about ottke and calzaghe? if only they were brothers imagine how great they would be...
ottke and calzaghe won 42 title fights in a row. ottke and calzaghe are on an 80 fight winning streak. ottke and calzaghe were co-champions for a combined 16 years. ottke and calzaghe have a 100 percent win ratio.Comment
-
yes i know. why do you always combine them? they are two different people. combining 2 different people and making one super champ because individually they are weak as hell. i just destroyed your little combo-champ nonsense by listing how much better ottke and calzaghe were than the klitschkos they just dont happen to be brothers but according to you if they were brothers they would be the greatest of all time.Comment
-
Comment
-
You didn't destroy anything..... read the title of this thread & comeback & apologize... lmao..... first off they weren't brother's.. dunno if they were even in the same division but i'm sure you'll enlighten me.yes i know. why do you always combine them? they are two different people. combining 2 different people and making one super champ because individually they are weak as hell. i just destroyed your little combo-champ nonsense by listing how much better ottke and calzaghe were than the klitschkos they just dont happen to be brothers but according to you if they were brothers they would be the greatest of all time.
Individually they are equally dominant otherwise they wouldn't be cumulatively dominant... again go back to the drawing board.Last edited by KBRO; 10-04-2013, 09:23 PM.Comment
-
you do realize boxing is an individual sport don't you? yes they were in the same division at the same time and never fought just like the klitschko's. they destroyed all the klitschko's "records" that you posted but because the klitshko's are brothers they get extra credit.Comment
-
This just in ottke and calzaghe were separated at birth! 42 title defenses in a row! 80 wins without losing! 16 years as champ! you guys are going to go ape-sh-it now right? i mean before you didn't even know or care who they were but now that they are brothers their weak i mean great accomplishments mean so much more right?Comment
Comment