Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Klitschko appreciation thread

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by KBRO View Post
    Wladimir Klitschko hasn't lost in 9.5 yrs.... 18 - 0.... his last 15 fights have been title fights

    Vitali Klitschko hasn't lost in 10 yrs...... 13 - 0....... his last 12 fights have been title fights.

    The Klitschko's are riding a 30 fight winning streak since either has lost (9.5 yrs) (including 27 straight title fights)

    The Klitschko's are 105-5 = 95.4%

    The Klitschko's have stopped 92 out of 110 opponents = 83.6%

    The Klitschko's have fought 548 rds & have won approximately 500 of them = 91.2%

    Wladimir has won 14 consecutive title defenses... Vitali has won 9 consecutive title defenses (11 if you count the Peter fight as a defense.... if we're keeping it real)

    The Klitschko's have won 23 consecutive title defenses between them dating back to the Calvin Brock fight 7 yrs ago.

    The Klitschko's have been undisputed champions for 2.25 yrs

    They've been co-champions going on 5 yrs now

    Either Klitschko has been a champion for 7.5 yrs now (9.5 yrs if including Vitali's stint as champion emeritus)

    Did you seriously look up and add up all that. lmfao.

    Comment


    • how about ottke and calzaghe? if only they were brothers imagine how great they would be...

      ottke and calzaghe won 42 title fights in a row. ottke and calzaghe are on an 80 fight winning streak. ottke and calzaghe were co-champions for a combined 16 years. ottke and calzaghe have a 100 percent win ratio.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by daggum View Post
        john and ottke have won 38 title fights in a row. john and ottke are on a 82 fight winning streak. john and ottke have been champion for 15 years. john and ottke have a 100 percent win ratio.
        Who the heck is john & ottke.. we're talking heavyweight champions of the world here.. you can do better than that.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by KBRO View Post
          Who the heck is john & ottke.. we're talking heavyweight champions of the world here.. you can do better than that.
          they have a longer reign than the klitschko's and they never lost, and you don't even know who they are lol. shows you just how "great" the klitshko's combo-championship run is. hint-not at all

          Comment


          • Originally posted by daggum View Post
            how about ottke and calzaghe? if only they were brothers imagine how great they would be...

            ottke and calzaghe won 42 title fights in a row. ottke and calzaghe are on an 80 fight winning streak. ottke and calzaghe were co-champions for a combined 16 years. ottke and calzaghe have a 100 percent win ratio.
            We're talking... same blood here & funny how you didn't list there stoppage rates.. neither could stop a fly... I meant flyweight.. excuse me.. hahahaha.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by KBRO View Post
              We're talking... same blood here & funny how you didn't list there stoppage rates.. neither could stop a fly... I meant flyweight.. excuse me.. hahahaha.
              yes i know. why do you always combine them? they are two different people. combining 2 different people and making one super champ because individually they are weak as hell. i just destroyed your little combo-champ nonsense by listing how much better ottke and calzaghe were than the klitschkos they just dont happen to be brothers but according to you if they were brothers they would be the greatest of all time.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by daggum View Post
                they have a longer reign than the klitschko's and they never lost, and you don't even know who they are lol. shows you just how "great" the klitshko's combo-championship run is. hint-not at all
                lol,,,too bad theyre not bros. ****** attempt dude

                Comment


                • Originally posted by daggum View Post
                  yes i know. why do you always combine them? they are two different people. combining 2 different people and making one super champ because individually they are weak as hell. i just destroyed your little combo-champ nonsense by listing how much better ottke and calzaghe were than the klitschkos they just dont happen to be brothers but according to you if they were brothers they would be the greatest of all time.
                  You didn't destroy anything..... read the title of this thread & comeback & apologize... lmao..... first off they weren't brother's.. dunno if they were even in the same division but i'm sure you'll enlighten me.

                  Individually they are equally dominant otherwise they wouldn't be cumulatively dominant... again go back to the drawing board.
                  Last edited by KBRO; 10-04-2013, 09:23 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by KBRO View Post
                    You didn't destroy anything..... read the title of this thread & comeback & apologize... lmao..... first off they weren't brother's.. dunno if they were even in the same division but i'm sure you'll enlighten me.
                    you do realize boxing is an individual sport don't you? yes they were in the same division at the same time and never fought just like the klitschko's. they destroyed all the klitschko's "records" that you posted but because the klitshko's are brothers they get extra credit.

                    Comment


                    • This just in ottke and calzaghe were separated at birth! 42 title defenses in a row! 80 wins without losing! 16 years as champ! you guys are going to go ape-sh-it now right? i mean before you didn't even know or care who they were but now that they are brothers their weak i mean great accomplishments mean so much more right?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP