Who wins: Evander Holyfield Vs Rocky Marciano

[Ascended]

“The lady doth protest too much methinks.”

You strike me as a very sad individual tbh man, you seem desperate for an argument over a fantastical subject, why? It’s an argument nobody can win, as it’s pure fantasy, somebody from the 50s fighting somebody from the 90’s, a definitive answer can never be proven. Yet you spam the forum with these same copied and pasted posts, why do you do it? It’s truly pathetic.

It's not fantasy if multiple crazy cult members like you are saying for a fact novices from the 30s-40s would beat guys in the '70s-90s when they never even faced guys even as advanced as the average person from that era I proved this multiple times

mutiple crazy idiots on here saying guys from 30-the 40s would beat guys in the '70s and '90s way more advanced than guys who I clearly can see are way more from the 70s-'90s I told you to keep trying to insult me it doesn't work on me so you're slow to keep trying


now answer my question can you alter/delete video 3rd time asking answer the question I won’t ask again if you ignore me again and act like you’re blind like you didn’t see me say it for the 3rd time I won’t respond any more to you

[garfios]

Looks like novices same as the hw class in this era what was the point to show me

They don't fight from range much; they leave themselves open a lot. A lot of times, they will just throw themselves into the body and not protect themselves. They use mostly counters when up close; the lateral movement is very basic; they don't seem to be able to punch from range while doing it smoothly; they have to stop then punch most of the time; and their feet are mostly tiptoeing. And a lot of times they wait for the person to hit them, standing right in front of their opponent

Do you not see all these things in that match cause they existed in that whole Novice era

I see, you don't see the point.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

It's not fantasy if multiple crazy cult members like you are saying for a fact novices from the 30s-40s would beat guys in the '70s-90s when they never even faced guys even as advanced as the average person from that era I proved this multiple times

mutiple crazy idiots on here saying guys from 30-the 40s would beat guys in the '70s and '90s way more advanced than guys who I clearly can see are way more from the 70s-'90s I told you to keep trying to insult me it doesn't work on me so you're slow to keep trying


now answer my question can you alter/delete video 3rd time asking answer the question I won’t ask again if you ignore me again and act like you’re blind like you didn’t see me say it for the 3rd time I won’t respond any more to you

I’m not saying anything of the such. I have no opinion on fantasy fights. I’m saying you’re an incredibly sad individual who needs a life.

[garfios]

It's not fantasy if multiple crazy cult members like you are saying for a fact novices from the 30s-40s would beat guys in the '70s-90s when they never even faced guys even as advanced as the average person from that era I proved this multiple times

mutiple crazy idiots on here saying guys from 30-the 40s would beat guys in the '70s and '90s way more advanced than guys who I clearly can see are way more from the 70s-'90s I told you to keep trying to insult me it doesn't work on me so you're slow to keep trying


now answer my question can you alter/delete video 3rd time asking answer the question I won’t ask again if you ignore me again and act like you’re blind like you didn’t see me say it for the 3rd time I won’t respond any more to you

I think you're delusional calling an hypothetical fight a fact. The first real boxing match occurred in 1681 and the first prize fight in 1719, so I think is very arrogant of you, for you to call athletes with 231 years of experience novices. You should move on to another sport or a least put a pair of gloves and find another novice to spar.

[4truth]

Would have been a great fight at 185-190, without the benefits of modern, uh...chemistry

[Rockin']

I think you're delusional calling an hypothetical fight a fact. The first real boxing match occurred in 1681 and the first prize fight in 1719, so I think is very arrogant of you, for you to call athletes with 231 years of experience novices. You should move on to another sport or a least put a pair of gloves and find another novice to spar.

When Assended talks, nobody listens nor even gives a *****.................Rockin'

[garfios]

When Assended talks, nobody listens nor even gives a *****.................Rockin'

You won't see me replying to him on a serious manner. I should have know after reading such a presumptuoustous username.

[Ascended]

I see, you don't see the point.

They don't fight from range much; they leave themselves open a lot. A lot of times, they will just throw themselves into the body and not protect themselves. They use mostly counters when up close; the lateral movement is very basic; they don't seem to be able to punch from range while doing it smoothly; they have to stop then punch most of the time; and their feet are mostly tiptoeing. And a lot of times they wait for the person to hit them, standing right in front of their opponent

Do you not see all these things in that match cause they existed in that whole Novice era

[Ascended]

When Assended talks, nobody listens nor even gives a *****.................Rockin'

He doesn't need to talk videos he post are the truth which you cant alter/delete

When I watch matches even before I post I see advances, when I'm just watching anytime I see advances, if I'm speaking to a person I remember the advances,see how you always will be wrong?, but that doesn't matter does it that I see those advances even without saying it in public


The problem comes with you cult members not liking me saying in public that guys in the 30s-50s are novices compared to 70s-90s see how you guys mind isn't sane you're offended I say it in public

You cult members are so slow you don't realize before I even came on this site I saw how obsolete the 30s-50s were compared to 70s-90s

it only became as I said a problem when I said it in public if I just posted the videos without calling them novices not one of you cult members would have a problem with that,coincidence? or hurt by being exposed?

[garfios]

He doesn't need to talk videos he post are the truth which you cant alter/delete

When I watch matches even before I post I see advances, when I'm just watching anytime I see advances, if I'm speaking to a person I remember the advances,see how you always will be wrong?, but that doesn't matter does it that I see those advances even without saying it in public


The problem comes with you cult members not liking me saying in public that guys in the 30s-50s are novices compared to 70s-90s see how you guys mind isn't sane you're offended I say it in public

You cult members are so slow you don't realize before I even came on this site I saw how obsolete the 30s-50s were compared to 70s-90s

it only became as I said a problem when I said it in public if I just posted the videos without calling them novices not one of you cult members would have a problem with that,coincidence? or hurt by being exposed?

https://********/fiNgUxPs1C4?si=ljs0Tm4HJWjENYoy
tell me if these two guys were novices.