Comments Thread For: Marquez Discusses Rejection of a Fifth Pacquiao Fight

[twosweethooks]

Well boys, that first fight was a draw by the record books but we KNOW that PAC got that draw by a "JUDGES" ERROR !!!! Should have been a win for PAC

We also know that the 2nd and 3rd fight is in the win column for Pac, that will never change no matter what you say or I say, it will stay the same

just like the Jr vs Castillo 1 and ODH jr fight,,,where its very clear that Castillo and ODH won hands down BUT it will never change no matter what.

It will always be said and KNOWN that even though JMM got a knockdown he was taking a killing and Pac got careless and was laid out for a long time, and it will always be known that that fight will be the only one that JMM won.

how do you say it ?????? ROB THAT

[MASTER1454]

Perfect picture ending? You mean Marquez being beaten up, dominated and hit with 50% of Pacquaios power punches?

"Manny Pacquaio landed 55% of his power punches in rounds 5 and 6".

A perfect ending would been either fighter dominating the other and then proceeding to KO them or win a unanimous decision. If you think being beaten up and for practically the whole fight then throwing a hail mary and it hitting is a perfect ending with no "what ifs" then you're simply a piss-drinker who is probably one of the people who believes Marquez should've won all 4

Marquez thinks he's the better fighter, but lost 3/4 of the fights (yes he lost the first, don't try dispute it). If you think a KO removes all your previous losses sorry, that's not how boxing works and never will. He's so confident, I'm sure he'd have no problem taking that confidence to the 5th fight and earning the best payday ever? Didn't think so. Instead he goes after the paper champion Bradley,

50% power punches landed & still got KTFO by 1 punch. End of story....

Why not double the satisfaction and pride, for double your career highest payday? I'd understand if this was an unwinnable fight for him, but I'm mostly getting "easy fight" from his fans. So why linger on the old memories when you can make some more, easily and very profitably?

I get the parity argument, you'd think he'd have learned from this when he passed on 750k to go lose to John for 30k in Indonesia. Pac's next guarantee is 18m, so it was a 60/40 split, far from insulting.

Again, if it's about going out on the highest note possible, he retires after 4. If it's about legacy, Pac 5 >> Alvarado.

No the highest note is getting that 5th belt - give it up.......

I like Marquez and celebrate his win but this is pure bullshhh. You both were a cu-nt hair from KO'ing each other but JMM managed to land his bomb first that's the difference and that's the reality. Prior to that punch landing he was in the danger zone. Not taking anything away from his win or his performance but we all know that was a savage fight for both men and I don't think Marquez wants to risk being put to sleep because he came mighty close to it. Bradley is a safer bet because there really isn't a ko history there or tremendous earth shattering power. Just say I closed that chapter in my life and I want to pursue other things that's sufficient enough...these other explanations make it sound like he was in no danger at all and we all bias aside know had the fight continued the worse it would've been for him. Hell look at the damage on his face when it ended.

You are taking away from his performance..... it doesn't matter what his reasoning is, he won definitively & they both said that would be the last fight...

[HeroBando]

No the highest note is getting that 5th belt - give it up.......

It's not like Bradley is a legit champ after that robbery. Besides, did you see how proud JMM was of that 4th belt, that came vacant interim vs Senchenko or something? I'm sure a vacant interim belt could have been arranged for Pac 5.

But he was also saying he might target Alvarado after Bradley. That's for both bucks and legacy, right?

[pistol whip]

It's not like Bradley is a legit champ after that robbery. Besides, did you see how proud JMM was of that 4th belt, that came vacant interim vs Senchenko or something? I'm sure a vacant interim belt could have been arranged for Pac 5.

But he was also saying he might target Alvarado after Bradley. That's for both bucks and legacy, right?

Juan is a forty year old man who wants to go out and fight twenty year old world champions. Since there is only one other fighter in that age group that is doing that other then Juan I think he gets the pass especially if he wins. Juan got the better of pac in the end and they both had four chances each to end a fight decisively and it was juan who did it. Im sorry that you cant accept that but you are just going to have to.

[MASTER1454]

It's not like Bradley is a legit champ after that robbery. Besides, did you see how proud JMM was of that 4th belt, that came vacant interim vs Senchenko or something? I'm sure a vacant interim belt could have been arranged for Pac 5.

But he was also saying he might target Alvarado after Bradley. That's for both bucks and legacy, right?

How so? Pac got a gift in the 3rd fight, so JMM is only going after what is rightfully his. Arrange a vacant belt? Really?????

[lillu89]

The boxing world doesnt recognise Marquez s victory because they all know he was all juiced up on steroids PEDs when he came in for Pacman. And even then, he was taking a pasting until he got one lucky shot in...He knows he ll have to take the test and without his PEDs, he's just an old man who ll get beat up by any A list fighter.

The boxing world does not recognize hes win cause of people like you crying and talking nonesence. Now go away.

[BKM-2010]

I can't stand this coward anymore. And lol @ still *****ing about how he was robbed against Pac yet he calls Bradley undefeated. Somebody should remind this oppertunist about what lengths he went to just to get more rematches from Pac who never needed him. Now he can't return the favor.

[trufightfanatic]

Marquez should already have won this belt. Two reasons: 1. He won the third fight against Pacquiao but got jobbed while Pacquiao had the belt. 2. Pacquaio easily beat Bradley while defending the title but got jobbed and had the belt stolen from him and shoulda been the belt holder the night Marquez ko'd him in the fourth fight.

[Nooblet]

to the floyd gay fans (only the fans not floyd) i am a pacquiao fan but i myself don't consider a 5th fight. what for? pacquiao got knocked out cold. it's the fight that sealed the chapter on their close encounters. there's nothing else to prove it.

the only ones going on and on about this issue are the ******ED pac fans and the ******ED floyd fans. y'all get the logic? ******ed vs ******ed = ******ed.

[AntonTheMeh]

i don't have a problem with jmm rejecting it. he's gotten ****ed over in the past, though, pac was winning before he went night night.