Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lucas Matthysse: "Rematch vs Garcia is signed and only thing left is to set the date"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I am in no way shape or form a Garcia or Lucas fan, and I picked Lucas to KO Danny.

    But god damn, it's been hilarious around here all the Lucas fans who said Danny was scared and are saying "Well he only won because Lucas' eye closed"......like the punches Danny was landing had nothing to do with his eye closing.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Garcia's Dad View Post
      The KD was clear? A rabbit punch, a pull into the ropes, Lucas gets tangled up and Weeks refuses to step in...

      That's clear?

      Matthyse absolutely does deserve a re-match, but the narratives have been written and people would rather see inferior fights for some reason. We got a bunch of non-paid business advisers on this site.

      Oh, while we're at it - any chance you could take those useless big-ass gifsoups out of your sig? It slows every goddamn thread I am in down.
      I knew that there was a reason why you were one of the first posters that I put on ignore when I came to this site.
      Last edited by Frank Ducketts; 09-17-2013, 08:08 AM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by 4Corners View Post
        I am in no way shape or form a Garcia or Lucas fan, and I picked Lucas to KO Danny.

        But god damn, it's been hilarious around here all the Lucas fans who said Danny was scared and are saying "Well he only won because Lucas' eye closed"......like the punches Danny was landing had nothing to do with his eye closing.
        It's called damage control 4, lmao!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by 4Corners View Post
          Anyways, I find it funny people think the champion has to give the challenger a rematch, even though the decision isn't even remotely in question.
          What I find funnier is people forget this was a title DEFENSE. The Matty stans are all talking about close or even rounds. IMO they go to the champ, you gotta EARN the title!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by SnakeVen0m View Post
            What I find funnier is people forget this was a title DEFENSE. The Matty stans are all talking about close or even rounds. IMO they go to the champ, you gotta EARN the title!
            Exactly. Lucas may have been the favorite going in, but he was the CHALLENGER. Danny had the titles, it was another title defense. If the decision was in question, I'd say he needs to give Lucas a rematch. Close fight......yes. Questionable decision.....not at all. Danny won a competitive fight, but clearly won it.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by SnakeVen0m View Post
              What I find funnier is people forget this was a title DEFENSE. The Matty stans are all talking about close or even rounds. IMO they go to the champ, you gotta EARN the title!
              That's ******ed. Garcia won without having to use ****** logic like that.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                That's ******ed. Garcia won without having to use ****** logic like that.
                If fighter A is defending a title against fighter B and I find a round being close or even I give that round to the champ. What's ****** about that?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by SnakeVen0m View Post
                  If fighter A is defending a title against fighter B and I find a round being close or even I give that round to the champ. What's ****** about that?
                  You should give the round to the person who deserves it. Not the champ just because he's the champ.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                    You should give the round to the person who deserves it. Not the champ just because he's the champ.
                    This is how I score non title fights. If it's a title fight, and I feel it's an even round, I take into consideration who's defending the title.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by CatchweightKing View Post
                      Why did Morales rematch Barrera? Why did he rematch Pacquiao? Why did Pacquiao rematch Marquez? Why did he rematch Barrera? Why did Rafa rematch Izzy? Why did Izzy rematch Rafa? Why did Ward rematch Gatti?

                      Seriously, do you understand how ****** this stance of not needing to rematch sounds?
                      You think any of those guys would have taken those rematches if the possibility of a career payday against a guy like Floyd existed? Plus all those rematches you mentioned had huge interest. Outside of hardcore boxing fans I don't see the casual fan demanding a rematch to this fight. It was a tough fight for both, but it wasn't an all time classic or anything. EVERYONE was demanding that Gatti/Ward do it again, this fight not so much. Don't misinterpret what I said. I am not saying there shouldn't be a rematch. I am just saying that it would be ****** of Garcia to sign up so quickly.

                      Lucas is a competitor so I know he wants it right away and maybe his team is promising it to him, but for the first time in his career Danny Garcia will have negotiating leverage over everyone he could fight outside of Floyd. The ****** thing would be for him to sign a contract for a rematch 2 days after the last fight. That's what I was saying.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP