When was the last time 2 undefeated Ring Champions fought to unify a division?
Collapse
-
A lot because it's not them that pick the P4P it's boxing experts and writers around the world.The only thing "official" about The Ring's rankings is that they are officially the rankings of Ring Magazine. If you want to talk official rankings then we're talking sanctioning bodies.
People used to put a lot of stock into the Ring, but really how much stock are you going to put in a magazine that rated Adrien Broner above Manny Pacquiao?Comment
-
Comment
-
Thing is though, it doesn't matter what promoter a fighter has. He's either ranked higher, or he's not. You don't award belts just because fights are clouded with politics. You don't award the belt at all till the fight gets made...
Using your logic, Pac would be rated way higher than Bradley at the time.
EDIT: I see Ninth Layer is practically arguing everything I am.
Bit of my own contribution - the RING effectively allows for rank 4 and rank 5 to fight for a RING belt. Their policy also allows them to ignore any fighter they want from their ratings, like Peterson (even though I hate this guy for his PED use) and Huck. If that sounds legitimate to you, then gl.Comment
-
good question but i dont think a fighter ever moved up to unify a division.
basilio vs robinson 1? Was basilio still welter champ?Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment