Seriously... how is Doug Fischer labeled as an expert?

[SkillspayBills]

Typical conceited ass "expert" that thinks he know more than anyone else is.

[DoktorSleepless]

I like Doug.

[Southpawology]

Do you really think hes going to predict every fight correctly? Thats impossible. Hes a good boxing journalist IMO.

[Bushidō]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_UsjwnagKI

Bump this on Sept. 14th... seriously.
He thought Mares would be Gonzalez, he thought Donaire would KO Rigo

Seriously... how do you get that label?

just becuase you are wrong on predictions doesn't mean you can't be a expert. As long as he can give concise breakdowns and explain his reasoning. Who the hell is 100% correct in life. Don't be a hater. You wish you had his job.

Shiet I thought Mares would win and so did most people. I also had Donaire winning. Obviously I was wrong on both.

Mares and Donaire were both favorites so even Vegas was wrong.

[UTEP]

Nobody's perfect, his picks a right more often then wrong, plus he has an ATG lisp and spits when he talks, that's hilarious.

[BoxingIsGreat]

Dougie is also a proud Mayweather hater. He says so.

[billeau2]

Dougie is also a proud Mayweather hater. He says so.

Funny how boxing works:

You can speak to a fighter who has BEEN in the ring with both guys fighting....of a fighter who has faced many opponents and they can have the most innane picks. Exhibit one: De La Hoya, when was the last time Oscar picked the correct guy to win? He is on record as saying Alvarez will beat Floyd....De La Hoya would probably pick Zelenoff!!

What that tells me is that fight "picking" is something else. If a ******** man went with all the Vegas picks he might do quite well. We all think we can spot the corrective, the time when the bookies are wrong...even the professionals! But in fact if we do this type picking? we will be wrong many more times than right.