Tweet
Replaying the Canelo-Trout fight, the commentary doesn't match what's happening in the ring (just listen to Malignaggie and Al Bernstein: When he is not punching and using defense, he is tired and needs to be more active.), spoon feeding some of our lower IQ members to believe that Alvarez is just slightly better than your run-off-the-mill plodding Mexican. It didn't fit the narrative that he actually displayed great (underrated) defense, which is what won him the fight more so than the offense - against a much taller, southpaw, Slick-Boxing type fighter. That's the narrative if you look at some of the comments made for this fight; That this fight will be one-sided drubbing (nonsense, this fight has a close, split decision written all over it); That Canelo will have to be Ultra-Aggressive and "put pressure" on Floyd to win the fight. That this is all he can do or has to do to win the fight.
No, it's actually the opposite. What he needs to do is NOT put pressure on Floyd to win the fight. What you're doing with that preconceived notion is basically giving away half the victory. It's almost like some feel that Floyd himself doesn't have to be really OFFENSIVE and try to land punches, but only his opponent does. NONSENSE. What Canelo needs to do is NOT fall into Floyd's trap by coming forward, making him look good by backing up and using his traditional defense & counter. What he needs to do is use that previously mentioned defense and keep the fight in the middle of the ring, making it a low-connect percentage Chess match. And if Floyd wants to or feels compelled to come forward ( a la Vs Zab Judah & Sharmbe Mitchell), then let him do it. Otherwise, stay in the middle of the ring.
It's almost like some feel that all Floyd himself has to do is coast and react off of what his opponent is trying to do, forgetting that he himself has to also be impressive offensively & land clean punches. And we all know that he is at his most impressive when half the work is being done for him, with his opponent obliging him by trying too hard with pressure and combination punch attempts (unless is a C level fighter like Gatti. This is where Gatti tried to Box and Floyd was ultra-offensive, displaying his entire arsenal of punches. NO, Alvarez is not Gatti).
No, it's actually the opposite. What he needs to do is NOT put pressure on Floyd to win the fight. What you're doing with that preconceived notion is basically giving away half the victory. It's almost like some feel that Floyd himself doesn't have to be really OFFENSIVE and try to land punches, but only his opponent does. NONSENSE. What Canelo needs to do is NOT fall into Floyd's trap by coming forward, making him look good by backing up and using his traditional defense & counter. What he needs to do is use that previously mentioned defense and keep the fight in the middle of the ring, making it a low-connect percentage Chess match. And if Floyd wants to or feels compelled to come forward ( a la Vs Zab Judah & Sharmbe Mitchell), then let him do it. Otherwise, stay in the middle of the ring.
It's almost like some feel that all Floyd himself has to do is coast and react off of what his opponent is trying to do, forgetting that he himself has to also be impressive offensively & land clean punches. And we all know that he is at his most impressive when half the work is being done for him, with his opponent obliging him by trying too hard with pressure and combination punch attempts (unless is a C level fighter like Gatti. This is where Gatti tried to Box and Floyd was ultra-offensive, displaying his entire arsenal of punches. NO, Alvarez is not Gatti).
Comment