Originally posted by Freedom2013
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How would you rate this HW era?
Collapse
-
-
Counter question:
If the Klitschko's had been from America, had this HW era been considered stronger than it is portrayed by the (American) media?
Comment
-
Originally posted by K-DOGG View PostNot the worst, I don't think; but far from the best. I believe a lot of the problem, at least in the states, is that there isn't enough exposure of the current crop to accurately access their abilities and worth.
That being said, the moment someone decided it was better to be 250 lbs and abandon any subtleties of the game is when we started getting into trouble.
Case in point: Sam Peter...waaaay too fat. Always has been. A man of his height should weigh no more than 230. The more weight you add on, the more speed you lose; and you don't necessarily gain any power. Your stamina suffers, your foot speed suffers, your hand speed suffers, the fans suffer from watching you fight. It's a downward spiral.
I'm not necessarily picking on Peter. There's Arerola, Brewster (after he picked up Buddy McGirt....course he's long gone; but I'm making a point about bad beginnings), etc, etc, etc.
The game will pick up when some young fighter out there who has the want to, comes in the ring around 220 Lbs under the lights of major network exposure and kicks some giant's ass.
I don't harp on this too much 'cause I know I'm in the minority; but one of the reasons, outside of lack of exposure, that the division has the rep it has is simpley that most modern heavyweight are physically incapable of putting on a good show while fighting. They're too damn slow, too inactive when they're in the ring, and don't fight enough in a calendar year.
Nothing to watch........division suffers. What to watch is dull.......division suffers more. Simple.
Comment
-
Only era that may rival the current one is that of the 90's.
Other than that this is definitely the strongest era of all time.
The boxers are in general lb for lb faster
in general More athletic
more powerful
stronger
and trained and managed more effective than ever before.
Fury is better than Michael Grant and Haye would be a top opponent/belt holder in any era!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Freedom2013 View PostA boxer like Tyson Fury would not only be a contender in past eras, he would be the HW champion.
Primo Carnera
Even someone like Tye Fields who started boxing in his mid-20s could be a champion in past eras:
Jess Willard
Tell me how a slow, clumsy, china-chinned plodder like Fury would be champion in the 60s-70s.
That question also goes to Tommo.
Comment
-
I dare to say that people who claim this HW era to be the worst ever are Klitschko haters who want to discredit the brothers achievements.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VG_Addict View PostThat has to be one of the ******est things you've ever said. And that's saying something.
Tell me how a slow, clumsy, china-chinned plodder like Fury would be champion in the 60s-70s.
We just saw Fury knock a champion cruiser out cold. Fury is much bigger than those guys, and he's not slow, watch how mobile he is around the ring.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostFor a start, the heavyweight division of the past was basically the cruiserweight division today.
We just saw Fury knock a champion cruiser out cold. Fury is much bigger than those guys, and he's not slow, watch how mobile he is around the ring.
Also, Fury used his forearm as much as he used his fists.
Comment
Comment