Joe Calzaghe Appreciation Thread
Collapse
-
-
thanks for pointing it out, it could have been on any thread in this forum Ihave no inclination to check the whole forum. It appears you think its normal to have that kind of time spare. Good luck with your sparetime, but for me checking the whole forum is beyond me yes.
The OP is an idiot to suggest McG was ducked by Joe of course, they are different eras.
In keeping with the spirit of the thread I would like to add that Joe had impressive longevity to around from Eubank era up to 2009, considering Kessler was still at school back then. He must have had an Olympian approach to training and maintaining that superfit engine.
You were insinuating that someone was lying because you couldn't be bothered to check.
Your post did not, and does not, deserve a genuine reply, if you genuinely think in this manner then nothing anyone says will change your mind unless you simply don't know that the majority of knockouts in boxing are TKO's. Your post was prejudicial and not a real attempt to judge Calzaghe's worth as a fighter.Last edited by Humean; 09-01-2013, 01:28 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
He's definitely an ATG. I wish I hadn't become disinterested in boxing at the time so I could've watched him live. I slowly began getting interested in boxing again because Pacroid got my attention.Comment
-
You know what makes me laugh everytime I see you say that..
Really?
Whos dream he crushed? Roy Jones, Hopkins? They have fans, but they actually didnt give a **** about Hopkins or Jones losing. They knew Jones was way past t. And That Hopkins had a good claim he won that fight. So your really reaching or trolling, might be both but that gets old after a while.
We all know a Prime Jones or Hopkins has no problems with this guy. And you know it as well. I'll give Joe this, he retired the smart way while bigger threats in 168 came, so props to him for that. But he's very over rated to be called a legend. But i guess with how this generation is, you 20-0 you ATG.Comment
-
Comment
-
My source was the video evidence from a Calzaghe fan, so if you think that is baised against Calzaghe, good luck with that thought, I can see why you opted out when its all there in the flesh in front of you.
In addition, I have added an appreciative fact about Joe to each post I made here.Last edited by DreamFighter; 09-02-2013, 03:54 AM.Comment
-
The video's were a very limited and biased sample to back up the view of someone who is not a Calzaghe fan and who is even more prejudicial than you are! That you cannot discern that is pretty astonishing. I hope to God that you never have to serve on a jury.My source was the video evidence from a Calzaghe fan, so if you think that is baised against Calzaghe, good luck with that thought, I can see why you opted out when its all there in the flesh in front of you.
In addition, I have added an appreciative fact about Joe to each post I made here.Comment
-
Comment
-
since when do juries work off internet forums and youtube vids? never. idiot comment.
obviously you didn't read what I'd said earlier that the video evidence cant be used to explain fights they don't show, but it does show premature ref stoppages, which you of course are in denial of and that's the salient fact here. And the video was made by a biased Joe fan too, yet you are blind enough to claim its against Joe. hmmm..Last edited by DreamFighter; 09-02-2013, 05:08 PM.Comment
Comment