Statistically Deontay Wilder is the most dominant force in boxing today.

[LoadedWraps]

28 Fights
28 Wins
28 Knock outs
100% KO Ratio

Average Opponent life span: 2.1 Rounds

Nice troll effort. (sarcasm)

None of those are stats I care about when evaluating a fighter, especially KO ratio. What a joke. What jokes I should say, you and your thread. KO ratio speaks on the lack of competition in the ring and/or the quality of opponents, day 1 stuff, new guy.

[Verstyle]

Have you seen the fighters he has faced?

[Verstyle]

Plus Billy Fox started his career of winning his fist 36 fights by ko

[luke1979]

No the actual bottom line is that statistics never tell the full story something you are being obtuse about. In boxing if stats were that important all fights would be won and lost according to compubox numbers. What is your point other than trying to start an argument with people for the sake of it.

[Spray_resistant]

28>than 1.
If you find someone who's stats is the same as Wilder's but with 33 fights.. than he will be the most dominant.. It's common sense dude..


Example:
1 Fight
1 Win
1 KO
Average Life Span of Opponents: 2 Rounds
vs

40 Fights
40 Wins
40 KO'S
Average Life Span of Opponents: 2 Rounds

Which is the more dominant stat?

This is a pretty dominant record 34-0 33ko

http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hum...6325&cat=boxer

Is he the most dominant CW in the world?

[Jloro]

Thats why Deontay is the next HW champ

[mezoomozaa]

yeah, he's also faced a who's who of tomato cans

Away from the fact that he is still unproven , but Knocking out 28 moving tomato cans in the ring is difficult

[Alx.]

Please leave

[Hitman932]

Have you seen the fighters he has faced?

I saw a couple of them down at the Austin YMCA peddling for change last week.

[silentscoper]

False.... we are talking pure math here and in pure math.. side factors like quality is irrelevant to the equation.

Example:
Guy #1 have slept with 20 of the fattest and ugliest girls at his University.
Guy #2 have only slept with 2 girls, but they are both gorgeous.

Statistically Guy #1 have gotten more ***** than Guy #2.

Guy #2 may have gotten HIGHER Caliber... but statistically Guy #1 is above Guy #2.

LMAO show me this strictly defined equation for statistical dominance. Then I'll make one up too.

For your hilarious example, statistically Guy #1 has had more pootietang but Guy #2 has scores of higher value. It is like taking free throws versus 3 pointers. You can make 40 free throws but even if I make just 14 3 pointers I've scored more than you.

I can make this **** up just the same man, your talk of "pure math" is some bull.