Comments Thread For: Bradley: Beating Marquez Will Put Me in The Hall of Fame

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #61
    Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
    Then who was,,, khan, maidana,, they were fighting for interm belts,, bradley had a legit belt,, khan lost to peterson, bradley beat the hell out of peterson,, alexander hadnt done too much to that point but neither had khan or maidana,, unless you think beating up ortiz and losing to khan makes you a top guy,,,
    Just tell me who the top 2 guys in the division in early 2011 were..
    Then
    Tim Bradley and Amir Khan.

    Comment

    • Sugar Adam Ali
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 27630
      • 970
      • 1,174
      • 82,827

      #62
      Originally posted by daggum
      you can score 10-8 rounds without knockdowns anyway. anyone with eyes saw bradley was floored and would score it 10-8 regardless of the clown ref. why you listening to a clown? also the 2nd round was clearly a 10-8 even though there was no official knockdown. when you beat someone up that badly for the entire round and make the ropes hold him up it's 10-8. you are letting a corrupt ref dictate your scorecard and you don't seem to care because you like bradley more than you like boxing. sad.


      Your wrong about me,,, I love boxing, i have no favorite fighters,,, i dont like bradley better than i do ruslan... i thought ruslan started hot but from the 3rd on bradley beat the hell out of him,, ruslan didnt do anything again till the 12th...
      even if you gave it 10-8 rounds in the 1,2,12 and gave ruslan another round,, you would still be 116-112 minus the 2point rounds and you have 113-112 bradley,.... thats pretty much how i scored it......

      Comment

      • Sugar Adam Ali
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2013
        • 27630
        • 970
        • 1,174
        • 82,827

        #63
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Tim Bradley and Amir Khan.
        ok, and alexander was probably 3... thats legit,,,

        but after bradley beat down alexander, i considered him the man, and lineal champ after manny left...

        Would have liked to see the khan-bradley but bradley had his eyes on the manny fight so cant blame him for not fighting amir

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #64
          Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
          ok, and alexander was probably 3... thats legit,,,

          but after bradley beat down alexander, i considered him the man, and lineal champ after manny left...
          If you're admitting Alexander was number 3, then how would Bradley be lineal champion if he beat him?? In Bradley fan logic?!?!?

          Alexander was like 4 or 5 after he clearly lost to Kotelnik.

          Comment

          • impitpatpuncher
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Jun 2012
            • 102
            • 8
            • 1
            • 6,236

            #65
            I randomly laughed when I read the title tbh

            Comment

            • Rome-By-Ko
              The winner Is
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 20157
              • 323
              • 332
              • 29,833

              #66
              Originally posted by HeroBando
              I think Tim has one of the better resumes in the sport. But now that you mention it, IMO Froch has a better resume at this point, not by a lot. He was never #1 at the weight, but basically both have a wide loss to a p4per, and one struggle, the rest mostly convincing wins over quality comp
              I would say Mares,not Froch(and I'm a big Froch fan)..Froch never was the top of his div and tbh he did not beat Ward..No matter how you feel about the decision,Bradley beat Pac..Oh and everyone else he faced..Noway would I put Froch above Bradley right now,and again I love Froch..Mares yes,imo Mares has the best resume of any young fighter..Clearly a top 5 fighter in my book..

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43345
                • 4,515
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #67
                Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
                [/B]

                Your wrong about me,,, I love boxing, i have no favorite fighters,,, i dont like bradley better than i do ruslan... i thought ruslan started hot but from the 3rd on bradley beat the hell out of him,, ruslan didnt do anything again till the 12th...
                even if you gave it 10-8 rounds in the 1,2,12 and gave ruslan another round,, you would still be 116-112 minus the 2point rounds and you have 113-112 bradley,.... thats pretty much how i scored it......
                you need to watch the fight again. ruslan dominated the 6th round and nearly ko'd bradley again and he clearly won the 11th. that's 5 clear rounds. so it's 113-112 prod. a very easy fight to score actually. you can even give ruslan the 10th for an even more dominant victory but people tend to give bradley every somewhat close round for god knows what reason.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                  I would say Mares,not Froch(and I'm a big Froch fan)..Froch never was the top of his div and tbh he did not beat Ward..No matter how you feel about the decision,Bradley beat Pac..Oh and everyone else he faced..Noway would I put Froch above Bradley right now,and again I love Froch..Mares yes,imo Mares has the best resume of any young fighter..Clearly a top 5 fighter in my book..
                  The difference is that Froch actually fought Ward and Bradley refused to fight his main rival in the division.

                  Comment

                  • Rome-By-Ko
                    The winner Is
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 20157
                    • 323
                    • 332
                    • 29,833

                    #69
                    I find it funny that Khan fans try to question anyone's logic..

                    Let's look at theirs shall we..

                    Lost to Prescott,god was punishing him(lol)..

                    Lost to Peterson,they call a clearly close fight a robbery(lol)

                    Lost to Garcia,oh nothing more then a lucky punch..

                    There is a trend and a fan base that is delusional,but it's not Bradley's..LMAO..

                    Comment

                    • Capricorn1985
                      Up and Comer
                      • May 2013
                      • 93
                      • 5
                      • 0
                      • 6,137

                      #70
                      a win vs marquez will make u more noticeable by far..but it'll take you much more for h.o.f'mer status...at least a fight vs Maidana, Mathysse , Garcia , Guerrero and even Ortiz... but coming off a loss to pacquiao(truly) and a good but ****** fight with provod... eeeh.. not even close buddy. sorry to burst ur bubble..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP