Can you be considered an ATG when these are your 10 best wins?
Collapse
-
More lies. And what does me being a mod have to do with anything? If you don't like my opinions and are upset you have no arguments against them I can understand that. But bringing up my moderating position repeatedly in a negative way equals staff harassment and is CLEARLY against the rules. I guess Boston Guy just missed those posts though because we all know how fair an unbiased he is.Its highly relevant since you and jab has laughed at the posters voting for Vitali in Jab's highly skewed and biased poll. Since you both define ATG in entirely different ways, how can you then be entitled to laugh at people who might define ATG in a third Way?
Just think. Jab has Vitali just out of the top 20 while you might have him as no. 100. Big difference.
That is the glaring problem of this thread; that ATG is left undefined. How can you have the nerve to ridicule people who do nothing wrong? They just vote according to their definition which clearly cannot be wrong since ATG is undefined. That makes you a troll.
Are you joking? I'm here to point out the hypocrisy of the oft-banned boxing history moderator. And you as well, but you are frankly nothing but a small irrelevant turd in this (and other) threads. Jab is a scholar of boxing history, and a forum leader so surely he can explain how there's nothing wrong with ridiculing posters who might rank Vitali as no. 20 while he himself ranks him JUST below.
Why doesn't he ridicule you? You rank Vitali maybe a whopping 80 places below him? Odd isn't it? Instead he harassess those who rank Vitali as little as A SINGLE PLACE above himself!
What does that tell you? It tells you that the oft-banned moderator jab is just a petty troll with an agenda.
Comment
-
Embarrass me? Lmao!! He's avoided every question and point I've made on topic and instead has tried to twist the topic into something else by asking his own question in a transparent effort to keep avoiding my own. Is that what you call "crafting a good argument"?
Comment
-
Post a link or STFU already! That's right, you can't!
Comment
-
Go back and watch it again, Lewis fell onto his stool. He had a round, maybe two left, and then he would have lost a war of attrition.to be fair,lennox was really coming on at the time of the stoppage.i personally thought he was on his way to stopping vitali.lewis looked alot fresher and i dont think vit could see his punches coming.and vit was cut by the lace on lewis glove.it had raked across his eye really hard when lewis had missed a punchComment
-
No excuses needed. Lewis agreed to a rematch then renegged. Vitali was game and, for years, ready to honor the post fight agreement.
Anyway, like I said, don't worry, your nightmare will be over within a few years.
Problem is, Europeans are rapidly improving and quickly taking the heavier weight divisions of boxing. The next crop are bound to be even better than the Klitschko's, as Kovalev is indication of.Last edited by hitman smax; 08-07-2013, 01:07 AM.Comment
-
What none of you brilliant and astute poster saying Vits resume is an all time great one get is its not just about fighting who you can in that era (and I've already shown Vits missed a truck load of fighters), its about what those fighters did before and after fighting Vittles. What exactly have these fighter done and gone on to before and after Vits? My argument is 'they haven't done much at all'. I challenge ANYONE to prove otherwise.
Peter - Crude slugger who went tooth and nail with a former middleweight
Adamek - Former lightheavyweight who's best win at heavy was Arreola
Arreola - Has never beaten another top 10 heavyweight
Donald - His career best win is over a ten years past his best Tim Witherspoon
Hide - His best win was over 11-1 Michael Bentt
Sanders - Never beat a top ten fighter before or after Wlad. Was stopped by Nate Tubbs
Williams - Come on, this is a guy who lost to Julius Francis
Kirk Johnson - Possessed skills but in his biggest fights always came in fat and out of shape
Gomez - Former cruiserweight who beat a few guys thought to be decent but were either past it or went on to accomplish nothing
Solis - Talented but still a novice by professional standards. Ridiculed for never being in shapeComment
-
No one is claiming that Vitali and Wladimir have had high quality opponents. Guess why? Because of when they were born. I don't know if you've noticed or not but the heavyweight division has been kind of weak in the past years. So you're judging the Klitschkos by whether or not they have access to a time machine.
Very simple question to put that mongoloid mind of yours in utter torment:
What if Ali had existed in this era?Comment
-
This is the thread I referenced in my thread. I respect Vitali, but that resume is not ATG worthy, no one calls Cotto an ATG, but he closely, but clearly won the poll on who was greater between him and Vitali. I'm not a Klitschko hater by any means and my thread was made more to show that Cotto is underrated than to diss Vitali.Comment
-
Comment