Originally posted by D-MiZe
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: London Calling: Flawed KO should be catalyst for change
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by D-MiZe View PostNo, I'm saying in his head he's thinking 'if he doesn't get up at 9, I'll end the fight'. Again, I'd be really interested to hear from the referee rather than the timekeeper or the officials at ringside who decided the result.
Watching it back doesn't change my opinion. Makes me think that maybe the referee thought he was taking a knee and when he got up it was because the fight was over. Either way, the referee didn't do everything he could've possibly done in his power to continue the fight. However, Scott gave him too much reason to end it.
Trust me, if there is a grievance, the BBBofC will pick it up and deal with it. But Scott didn't look too bothered with the ending and I haven't heard anything since.
EDIT: The count ends once a fighter is stood-up, unless it's a standing 8, the referee can continue if he wants. Let's not be pedanitic about that.
It's clear you've made up your mind but don't want to admit that yore wrong wrong because you clearly are. You're just in justify mode now
Comment
-
Originally posted by DosRounds View PostI think they should interview refs afterwards to see why they made a certain choice and what they saw
It was like getting Duane Ford to justify his Pac-Bradley scores, he just made an idiot out of himself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostThey did that with Cortez after the Ortiz farce and all he did was show how his pre-conceptions about the fighters influenced his decision-making. A lot of these refs are actually pretty braindead, I'd rather not hear what they have to say when they only confirm their incompetence.
It was like getting Duane Ford to justify his Pac-Bradley scores, he just made an idiot out of himself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostThey did that with Cortez after the Ortiz farce and all he did was show how his pre-conceptions about the fighters influenced his decision-making. A lot of these refs are actually pretty braindead, I'd rather not hear what they have to say when they only confirm their incompetence.
It was like getting Duane Ford to justify his Pac-Bradley scores, he just made an idiot out of himself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostThey did that with Cortez after the Ortiz farce and all he did was show how his pre-conceptions about the fighters influenced his decision-making. A lot of these refs are actually pretty braindead, I'd rather not hear what they have to say when they only confirm their incompetence.
It was like getting Duane Ford to justify his Pac-Bradley scores, he just made an idiot out of himself.
Comment
-
-
Better to be too cautious than too lax? How about... better to do it RIGHT. Doing it RIGHT means you don't skroo-over either fighter. I agree with Lyle on this one. 10 means 10. Let the fight play out to it's natural finish. Don't be a Joe Cortez type ref. Way too much corruption in this sport.
Comment
Comment