Comments Thread For: Terrell Gausha Very Upset With Zimmerman Verdict

[Aztekkas]

So let me get this straight. People are up in arms over this trial, yet fail to see that more harm is done to themselves by their own people on a day to day bases in the "hood". Hmmm. Let hundreds of young minority teens slit each others throat and kill each others family over sneakers and no one says a ****ing word, but as soon as the media gives two seconds to a case everyone is ready to help burn the system down. LOL these people need to gather themselves, re evaluate their position, and begin by fixing their own surroundings. FOR MURIKA

[Russian Crushin]

I see we have a lot of white **********s on this forum. You should have seen the **********s on Fox they had a show and a roundtable discussion and this dude kept asking what if the kid was white and the killer was black how would you feel then??? Not one fooken person answered the question because they know they would be in an uproar!.
This crap came down to race.

It came down to race because of the racial divide in the media and public that pressured the DA to press charges when they had nothing on him.

Like or not thats all it was about, 5 white women and one multi racial woman are suppose to be able to understand where a yojng black kid is coming from?

Why would they need to know where he's coming from. Their job was to determine if Zimmerman committed a crime based on the evidence provided

yeah right. I honestly dont think they could have charged him with murder 1 but at the very least it was manslaughter.

Do you know what manslaughter is? Zimmerman was found not guilty based on that he shot him on self defense. How can he be found guilty of manslaughter when the killing was basically considered justifiable?

So now we can follow suspect individuals and have a gun in our belts then when we are getting our asses kicked we can pull out the gun and shoot them and claim self defense???

Yes, it is legal to follow, whereas it is not legal to attack someone and beat their head into the concrete. If you attack someone, the other guy is allowed to defend himself, no?

Recently (last week) i believe a black woman got sentenced to 20 years for firing warning shots to an individual who was threatening her warning shots guys this dude feared for his life from alil boy??

Kovalev killed a guy a few years ago in the ring, why isnt he in jail for murder?? Apples and oranges, thats why

[LightningRT]

i agree.zimmerman's face didn't show the type of swelling or damage associated with a life threatening beating.

Uh, um....thats because he decided not to let Trayvon continue pounding on him and finally ended the beating, duh? If someone hits you, drops you and slams your head against the cement 5 times and there is nothing to stop him, he could have continued till Zimmerman suffered brain injuries or killed him. Zimmerman took out the garbage, properly.

[ShoulderRoll]

it wasn't even close to the type of damage you'd see in a life threatening beating. there was no measurable head injury. it looked like he was dropped with very few shots, and that he split his head on the ground when he fell.

He basically got in a fist fight with a 17 year old kid and got his ass whipped. When he couldn't handle himself in the fight he pulled out a gun and shot Trayvon.

The guy is no hero and it's sad that things escalated to a point where a teen who had been doing nothing wrong had to die.

For initiating this Zimmerman should have received some type of punishment. A human life has to have that value.

[Russian Crushin]

He basically got in a fist fight with a 17 year old kid and got his ass whipped. When he couldn't handle himself in the fight he pulled out a gun and shot Trayvon.

The guy is no hero and it's sad that things escalated to a point where a teen who had been doing nothing wrong had to die.

For initiating this Zimmerman should have received some type of punishment. A human life has to have that value.

Except there is no proof that he initiated it

[New England]

Uh, um....thats because he decided not to let Trayvon continue pounding on him and finally ended the beating, duh? If someone hits you, drops you and slams your head against the cement 5 times and there is nothing to stop him, he could have continued till Zimmerman suffered brain injuries or killed him. Zimmerman took out the garbage, properly.

it's very obvious that his head was not repeatedly slammed into the ground. if it was, trayvon was very weak and not doing any damage of real consequence. i don't know how anybody could believe that a life threatening beating took place given the photos.

the issue was that there was no testimony from martin to the contrary, because he was dead.

[Mr. Philadel]

Except there is no proof that he initiated it

c'mon man....he's on the phone with the authority calling the kid a PUNK before anything even popped off.....he already had his mind made up on what type of kid the kid was.....no testimony or cross examinations needed to overstand what occured

we all know how rental cops or wanna be cops like to flex their limited authority....the kid felt violated and defended himself.....ground and pounded the stalker, who turned out to be the REAL punk because he used a gun in a fist fight against a kid 40 pounds smaller than him

dudes get rabbit punched with 8-10 oz gloves on and have to pause a minute.....but Z Man can take rabbit punches from the concrete an STILL pull out the tooly and deliver a chest shot?!?....amazing!!..smh

[Marvellous1]

None of those questions matter. . . Zimmerman was the neighborhood watch man, and was trying to do good for his community.

If there had been a recent string of ******ations, then a middle-age white dude would be suspect; however, there had been a recent string of burglaries (with young black males seen during, and around the time of the crimes).

Following somebody is not a crime, and does not give you a reason to attempt beat that person an inch from their life. Had Trayvon just snuck Zimmerman once, and hten took off running once he hit the ground, I might be sympathetic to lil skittlez, but he took it upon himself to try to kill some guy just trying to do good for his neighborhood, and got his comeuppance.

So what is the difference between following an innocent person, minding their own business and stalking in the US? Is it really legal to follow anyone with no evidence of wrong doing, intention of wrong doing or prior knowledge of wrong doing or who they are, neighbourhood watch or police? You can just decide to follow anyone you like and when questioned about it, state you thought they were "su****ious"? So where does "doing good" end and harrassment/stalking start? I really do worry about the kind of world we live in.

The questions DO matter because I'm trying to determine what made Trayvon "su****ious" other than how he looked/dressed. Also, no one knows for sure if Trayvon Martin's intention was to kill. We weren't there. The only person who could confirm or deny that is dead. Again, based on the law, the evidence and what I know of the prosecution's case, Zimmerman could only be found innocent. But if people can't see his error in judgement (considering the tragic conclusion), no matter what his intentions were, I seriously question their moral code.

[Ray*]

I thought this was a thread about a boxing verdict.. Now we are some type of political posters on NSB lol.... Before we were PED experts..please get back to boxing and leave the politics somewhere else.

[bojangles1987]

I don't want to generalize but the two biggest racists on this site are on your side and yes everybody followed the case you are not special. If it was your kid would you be so understanding? And he did follow him for no reason and thats why TM is dead.

You think I'm going to change my mind because a couple of trolls are celebrating something not worth celebrating? I ripped into them in the thread in the lounge.

Doesn't change that the case against Zimmerman was weak and the jury wasn't wrong not to convict him. He should have gotten something, but not what they charged him with. It's the risk the prosecution took trying to get him for second degree murder when they didn't have enough to prove it.