Alexander talking made trash about Khan and Brook..

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Prince Mongo
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 1558
    • 62
    • 83
    • 2,060

    #21
    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
    The same way your opinion is that Khan should have clearly beat Peterson on points..LOL..What a joke that is
    I agree with you on this. The Peterson fight was tight at the time I felt Peterson just edged it. But what is very clear and not debateable regardless of who you felt won was that Khan's performance was very poor where he demonstated his inability to cope with pressure and complete lack of infighting skills. The Team Khan spin is that Peterson won because of dodgy judges,a man in a hat and Peterson's PEDs. Even if you wipe that loss out you can't erase Khan's shoddy performance in that fight. alexander's performance against Kotelnik was also poor.
    IMO both Alexander and Khan are both very suspect and about the same level. I have a feeling Khan will win on points.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #22
      Originally posted by Prince Mongo
      I agree with you on this. The Peterson fight was tight at the time I felt Peterson just edged it. But what is very clear and not debateable regardless of who you felt won was that Khan's performance was very poor where he demonstated his inability to cope with pressure and complete lack of infighting skills. The Team Khan spin is that Peterson won because of dodgy judges,a man in a hat and Peterson's PEDs. Even if you wipe that loss out you can't erase Khan's shoddy performance in that fight. alexander's performance against Kotelnik was also poor.
      IMO both Alexander and Khan are both very suspect and about the same level. I have a feeling Khan will win on points.
      Team Khan caused Peterson to fail a drugs test, yeah?

      Comment

      • Rome-By-Ko
        The winner Is
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 20157
        • 323
        • 332
        • 29,833

        #23
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
        Those are opinions too dumbass. They are opinions of judges! People are supposed to have their own opinions but you are a sheep apparently.
        LMAO,no judges opinions are law ya dumb ****..I do have an opinion..That won't change the(fact)outcome of the fight..Ya fuccking moron..

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #24
          Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
          LMAO,no judges opinions are law
          Oh wow

          Comment

          • Rome-By-Ko
            The winner Is
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 20157
            • 323
            • 332
            • 29,833

            #25
            Originally posted by Master Chief
            I agree. Good post



            He said Khan should have won on points, he didn't say clearly. Now I remember why I dislike you. You are a bias tool who then ends up saying **** like 'I guess that was a lucky punch as well'. You're trying to put words into peoples mouths.

            Please stop being a fool.
            Is this not the same thing..Unless he said(or suggested)that the fight could have went either way,which he obviously was not doing..Then he was suggesting that Khan clearly won the fight,which imo is a joke..

            I don't have to put words into peoples mouths..This is what he's suggested before..Dumb shhit like this..My dude I really don't even know who the fucck you are..So I really don't know why you would not like me..It's strange that you would have any feelings about me in general being we're just talking boxing..

            I'm bias about what??Explain?

            Comment

            • Rome-By-Ko
              The winner Is
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 20157
              • 323
              • 332
              • 29,833

              #26
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              Oh wow
              LMAO,so Dirk in which fight did your almighty opinion change the outcome??I'll wait..

              Comment

              • Prince Mongo
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2010
                • 1558
                • 62
                • 83
                • 2,060

                #27
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                Team Khan caused Peterson to fail a drugs test, yeah?
                Where did I write that? That is your invention.

                Comment

                • 786
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 1164
                  • 394
                  • 975
                  • 16,270

                  #28
                  Going off Alexander's one loss and the way in which he lost, I like Khan to out tough him. Alexander seemed to quit against Bradley.

                  Having said that, Alexander has looked better than Khan in his recent performances. Khan - Diaz was worrying. Khan was in survival mode against a career Lightweight from the 4th round. Maybe the step up to welterweight will help his punch resistence in the way his initial move to light welter did.

                  I like Khan in this fight, think he's more skilled, obvioulsy faster and IMO has more heart.

                  As for Kell, not sure he'll cut it in the big leagues...he's got time to prove me wrong though.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                    LMAO,so Dirk in which fight did your almighty opinion change the outcome??I'll wait..
                    It's not about changing the outcome. Nothing will change the draw on Lennox Lewis' record against Holyfield but everyone KNOWS in their own head what happened. To literally go against your own opinion makes you sound like an absolute ***ing spaz. None of this is "fact" or "law". LOL@ LAW

                    Originally posted by Prince Mongo
                    Where did I write that? That is your invention.
                    You said it was Team Khan's spin about Peterson being on PEDs.

                    Comment

                    • Los Zetas
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 3918
                      • 193
                      • 74
                      • 5,543

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
                      Is this not the same thing..Unless he said(or suggested)that the fight could have went either way,which he obviously was not doing..Then he was suggesting that Khan clearly won the fight,which imo is a joke..

                      I don't have to put words into peoples mouths..This is what he's suggested before..Dumb shhit like this..My dude I really don't even know who the fucck you are..So I really don't know why you would not like me..It's strange that you would have any feelings about me in general being we're just talking boxing..

                      I'm bias about what??Explain?
                      No it is not the same thing. He said Khan should have won on points anyway. If you are going to quote someone, quote word for word. Why add clearly when he did not type it? You just put a word in his mouth by adding clearly.

                      Also it came across that his main point was, a failed drugs test anyway, which you totally ignored for some reason.

                      I don't like you because it is a feeling that as a human, we are capable of. It may be a boxing forum, it could be on a pokemon forum or a gay forum, it doesn't matter. I have read your posts and you clearly are bias and have an agenda when it comes to certain boxers. You are delusional and often argue a case strongly, and sometimes even wrongly according to many other peoples opinion.

                      As Haye stated, it's hard to argue with an idiot because they will beat you on experience.

                      You talking made ****.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP