I thought Barker did waay better than Macklin against Martinez. I never understood why Macklin was praised for his effort against Martinez more than Barker. After a rewatch of the Macklin fight and getting over Martinez not looking as good as usual, the only rounds I gave Macklin were 4 and 5. It was at lot closer on the scorecards because of the bs knock down in the 7th. There's no comparison between the damage Barker did and the damage Macklin did. Barker broke Martinez' nose while Martinez' face after Macklin looked spotless. Barker also consistently landed clean punches through out the fight while I thought it was rare for Macklin to land anything decent. (made a highights vid of the Barker fight a while back) Even if you gave Barker less rounds, what he did in those rounds were more effective than what Macklin did. The problem was that Martinez did much less against Macklin than Martinez did against Barker. What Barker did in losing rounds rounds and what Macklin did in winning rounds makes me think Barker will do better against Golovkin than Macklin regardless of the Martinez scorecards.
Barker has been looking pretty good lately and I like the confidence he's showing. That confidence might bite him in the ass against a big puncher like Golovkin though. He'll likely revert to the way he fought Martinez, which will let him last longer. He'll still get goodboyed via bodyshot.
That was only in reference to his next fight, which is perfectly understandable with his long layoff and injuries. Going from Rotolo to Golovkin would be ******. I'll think Hearn will be fine with a Golovkin fight if Barker beats Geale.
Barker has been looking pretty good lately and I like the confidence he's showing. That confidence might bite him in the ass against a big puncher like Golovkin though. He'll likely revert to the way he fought Martinez, which will let him last longer. He'll still get goodboyed via bodyshot.
Originally posted by ThePhantom5
View Post
Comment