Comments Thread For: Carl Froch vs. George Groves is Ordered By The IBF

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Weebler I
    El Weeblerito I
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 31094
    • 1,459
    • 1,648
    • 54,550

    #11
    Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Rodriguez is scheduled to face Grachev in two weeks at 171.5. He could lose, get injured, etc. How could he get ordered to fight someone, let alone make a deal before July 10 and he fights on July 13.
    and Oosthuizen?

    What does it matter if Rodriguez loses at LH? Does that affect the rankings at a lower weight?

    Originally posted by hhwff3000
    All the fighters above Groves on the rankings are occupied. Edwin, and Lucian, have fights planned and I'm sure after that draw with Ward's sparring partner Gonzales, Thomas isn't lining up for a massacre. You got to remember Froch hasn't had a mandatory obligation since he won the belt off Bute, so this had to come sooner or later.
    Rodriguez has a fight planned in July, this bout with Froch is months away.

    I don't want to see Groves v Froch, GG will get destroyed. It's a waste of date late in Froch's career. I'm not even certain GG would beat Mack who went 8 rds with Cloud.
    Last edited by Weebler I; 07-01-2013, 09:33 PM.

    Comment

    • Malachai
      Amateur
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Jun 2013
      • 3
      • 1
      • 33
      • 6,023

      #12
      Originally posted by 285Kid
      Did he do something over the weekend to jump the line??

      Both Rodriguez and Bute already got fight lined up, as for Oosth he just got a draw in his last figth so maybe he got dropped a bit in the ranking and it's just not updated yet. What about Stevenson though, he was the number 1 when the IBF gave Froch an extension for an unification yet the number 1 spot is "not rated" . What with that? Just because he fougth at LH in his last fight? He fougth in the SMW division in the last year, shouldn't he still be there? I really don't understand ranking sometime.

      Comment

      • Drunk Punch
        In Asia
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2006
        • 5823
        • 172
        • 130
        • 12,619

        #13
        I think I'm the only one who wants to see this fight.

        Comment

        • Weebler I
          El Weeblerito I
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 31094
          • 1,459
          • 1,648
          • 54,550

          #14
          Originally posted by Malachai
          Both Rodriguez and Bute already got fight lined up, as for Oosth he just got a draw in his last figth so maybe he got dropped a bit in the ranking and it's just not updated yet. What about Stevenson though, he was the number 1 when the IBF gave Froch an extension for an unification yet the number 1 spot is "not rated" . What with that? Just because he fougth at LH in his last fight? He fougth in the SMW division in the last year, shouldn't he still be there? I really don't understand ranking sometime.
          I think that's b/s though. Rodriguez has been waiting his whole career for a fight like this and it won't be until November/December anyway. What determines the cut-off date?

          As to Stevenson, he apparently vacated his mandatory challenger spot. No, I don't understand it either.

          Comment

          • The Hammer
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 50797
            • 3,416
            • 8,704
            • 58,851

            #15
            This is not a good fight for the career of either boxer.

            It's too soon for Groves, he needs 2-3 more fights. And beating Groves at this time won't add much for Froch's legacy.

            The IBF should have ordered an eliminator, Groves vs. an IBF contender.

            Comment

            • vacon04
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2011
              • 3839
              • 99
              • 81
              • 10,658

              #16
              Why? Froch will beat Groves and he won't gain anything.

              Comment

              • ShoulderRoll
                Join The Great Resist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 55980
                • 10,048
                • 5,025
                • 763,445

                #17
                The other contenders either are occupied, moved up in weight, or just had a draw.

                So George Groves it is. Froch can just drop the belt if he doesn't deem him worthy though.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Freedom2013
                  This is not a good fight for the career of either boxer.

                  It's too soon for Groves, he needs 2-3 more fights. And beating Groves at this time won't add much for Froch's legacy.

                  The IBF should have ordered an eliminator, Groves vs. an IBF contender.
                  Should be Groves vs DeGale II but Ugly Kid doesn't want the fight.

                  Comment

                  • HeroBando
                    I love Mayweather
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 17452
                    • 236
                    • 0
                    • 24,430

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Malachai
                    Both Rodriguez and Bute already got fight lined up, as for Oosth he just got a draw in his last figth so maybe he got dropped a bit in the ranking and it's just not updated yet. What about Stevenson though, he was the number 1 when the IBF gave Froch an extension for an unification yet the number 1 spot is "not rated" . What with that? Just because he fougth at LH in his last fight? He fougth in the SMW division in the last year, shouldn't he still be there? I really don't understand ranking sometime.
                    I think you get removed from the rankings if you have a belt. I know this is the case in a single weight class, you can't be a ranked IBF contender and hold a WBO belt at 154 for example, but probably true in general

                    Comment

                    • Earl-Hickey
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 29031
                      • 2,832
                      • 1,384
                      • 297,750

                      #20
                      Originally posted by The Weebler II
                      and Oosthuizen?

                      What does it matter if Rodriguez loses at LH? Does that affect the rankings at a lower weight?



                      Rodriguez has a fight planned in July, this bout with Froch is months away.

                      I don't want to see Groves v Froch, GG will get destroyed. It's a waste of date late in Froch's career. I'm not even certain GG would beat Mack who went 8 rds with Cloud.
                      Oosthuizen was offered the froch fight late last year but pulled out so we got mack instead, he also looked rubbish this weekend. Rodriguez has a scheduled date and will be offered a mando spot if he wins, it's that simple.

                      Froch vs Groves will sell out the O2 and is easy to make, it will happen like it or not

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP