C*nts like this are always entertaining. They disguise their bias in this "good for the sport" facade. They ignore Golovkin's claims about "anybody from 154 to 175", yet they demand a guy that fights at 155 to fight Golovkin at 160. They laugh at the mere possibility that a guy that fights at 155 can make 154. Even when he signs to fight at 154, they still fill their head with delusions.
Then you have a real warrior (Ward), that is denied a great fight, a fight that would be "good for the sport", so he moves up to 175 and signs to fight the best of the best. Yet, these "good for the sport" cuckolds ignore this so called "bravery" and are left to make the most of the cute accent and bum slaying ability of the man they want to be anally penetrated by (Ducklovkin).
Ward cleaned out 168 and has signed to fight a literal killer at 175. What has Golovkin done? Win 2 interim belts that were later elevated to full belts and stop David Lemieux? How can anyone argue "good for the sport" after comparing these resumes?
You can't. Unless you are a biased c*nt.
/thread
Then you have a real warrior (Ward), that is denied a great fight, a fight that would be "good for the sport", so he moves up to 175 and signs to fight the best of the best. Yet, these "good for the sport" cuckolds ignore this so called "bravery" and are left to make the most of the cute accent and bum slaying ability of the man they want to be anally penetrated by (Ducklovkin).
Ward cleaned out 168 and has signed to fight a literal killer at 175. What has Golovkin done? Win 2 interim belts that were later elevated to full belts and stop David Lemieux? How can anyone argue "good for the sport" after comparing these resumes?
You can't. Unless you are a biased c*nt.
/thread
Comment